<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="fr">
	<id>https://baripedia.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=%E7%BE%8E%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%AA%E6%B3%95%E5%92%8C_19_%E4%B8%96%E7%BA%AA%E6%97%A9%E6%9C%9F%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A</id>
	<title>美国宪法和 19 世纪早期社会 - Historique des versions</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://baripedia.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=%E7%BE%8E%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%AA%E6%B3%95%E5%92%8C_19_%E4%B8%96%E7%BA%AA%E6%97%A9%E6%9C%9F%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://baripedia.org/index.php?title=%E7%BE%8E%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%AA%E6%B3%95%E5%92%8C_19_%E4%B8%96%E7%BA%AA%E6%97%A9%E6%9C%9F%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-08-01T11:44:16Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Historique des versions pour cette page sur le wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.38.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://baripedia.org/index.php?title=%E7%BE%8E%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%AA%E6%B3%95%E5%92%8C_19_%E4%B8%96%E7%BA%AA%E6%97%A9%E6%9C%9F%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A&amp;diff=59959&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Arthur : /* 孟禄主义 */</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://baripedia.org/index.php?title=%E7%BE%8E%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%AA%E6%B3%95%E5%92%8C_19_%E4%B8%96%E7%BA%AA%E6%97%A9%E6%9C%9F%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A&amp;diff=59959&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2023-08-14T07:59:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;auto&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;autocomment&quot;&gt;孟禄主义&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122;&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;tr class=&quot;diff-title&quot; lang=&quot;fr&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Version précédente&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Version du 14 août 2023 à 09:59&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l333&quot;&gt;Ligne 333 :&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Ligne 333 :&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Fichier:James Monroe 01.jpg|thumb|right|200px|James Monroe.]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Fichier:James Monroe 01.jpg|thumb|right|200px|James Monroe.]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The Monroe Doctrine, formulated in &lt;/del&gt;1823 &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;in President James Monroe's annual message to Congress, is one of the main pillars of American foreign policy in the Western Hemisphere. It came at a time when many Latin American countries had recently gained independence from the European colonial empires, principally Spain. The United States, wishing to secure an area of influence free from European interference, set out several key principles:&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;门罗主义是 &lt;/ins&gt;1823 &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;年詹姆斯-门罗总统向国会提交的年度咨文中提出的，是美国西半球外交政策的主要支柱之一。当时，许多拉丁美洲国家刚刚从欧洲殖民帝国（主要是西班牙）手中获得独立。美国希望确保自己的势力范围不受欧洲干涉，因此制定了几项重要原则：&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;# &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The American continent is no longer open to European colonisation.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;# &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;美洲大陆不再对欧洲殖民开放。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;# &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Any European intervention in the Western Hemisphere would be considered an act of aggression requiring American intervention.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;# &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;欧洲在西半球的任何干涉都将被视为需要美国干预的侵略行为。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;# &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The United States would refrain from participating in the internal wars of European nations and from interfering in the affairs of existing European nations.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;# &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;美国将不参与欧洲国家的内部战争，不干涉现有欧洲国家的事务。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Although the doctrine was issued primarily in response to potential threats from European powers, such as the Holy Alliance, that might attempt to regain control of newly independent colonies, it also solidified the position of the United States as the dominant power in the Western Hemisphere. Over time, this doctrine would be invoked to justify not only the defence of Latin American nations against foreign interference, but also certain American interventions in the region, under the pretext of stabilising &lt;/del&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;failing&lt;/del&gt;&amp;quot; &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;republics or protecting American interests. It has thus served both as a protective shield for the Western hemisphere and as a tool to justify the expansion of American influence. Although the Monroe Doctrine established the United States as the protector of Latin America, it was not necessarily welcomed or unreservedly accepted by the Latin American nations themselves, many of whom perceived this protection as another form of imperialism.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;尽管这一理论主要是为了应对欧洲列强（如神圣同盟）可能试图重新控制新独立殖民地的潜在威胁，但它也巩固了美国作为西半球霸主的地位。随着时间的推移，这一理论不仅被用来为保卫拉美国家不受外国干涉辩护，也被用来为美国在该地区的某些干预行动辩护，借口是稳定 &lt;/ins&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;失败 &lt;/ins&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;的共和国或保护美国的利益。因此，门罗主义既是西半球的保护伞，也是为美国扩大影响力辩护的工具。尽管门罗主义确立了美国作为拉美保护者的地位，但拉美国家本身并不一定欢迎或毫无保留地接受它，其中许多国家认为这种保护是另一种形式的帝国主义。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Faced with this wave of independence in Latin America, the United States felt the need to define a clear policy towards its western hemisphere. The Monroe Doctrine was part of this approach. The first decades of the 19th century saw the collapse of the Spanish and Portuguese colonial empires in America. The Haitian Revolution, which led to Haitian independence in &lt;/del&gt;1804&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;, was the first striking manifestation of the desire for autonomy in the region. It was the first Latin American country to gain independence and the first republic to be run by former slaves. Subsequently, the independence movement spread, with emblematic figures such as Simón Bolívar and José de San Martín playing central roles in the struggles for liberation from Spanish colonial rule. Brazil's declaration of independence in &lt;/del&gt;1822&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;, which led to its peaceful separation from Portugal with the ascension of Peter I as emperor, was also a sign of the region's transformation. However, it was the emancipation of the vast Spanish colonies that most alarmed the European powers, some of whom were considering the possibility of re-intervening in the region. The United States, which had itself fought for independence against a colonial power at the end of the 18th century, viewed these liberation movements favourably, not only for ideological but also strategic reasons. By establishing the Monroe Doctrine, they sought to deter any return of the European powers to Latin America. This doctrine took the form of an affirmation that the Americas should be free from any European intervention or recolonisation. However, behind this apparent solidarity with the newly independent nations of Latin America, there was also a strategic dimension. The United States, keen to guarantee its own security and extend its sphere of influence, did not want a powerful European presence on its doorstep. The Monroe Doctrine, while presenting itself as a shield against European imperialism, also marked the beginning of the United States' assertion as the dominant power in the Western Hemisphere.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;面对拉丁美洲的独立浪潮，美国认为有必要对其西半球制定明确的政策。门罗主义就是这种政策的一部分。19 世纪头几十年，西班牙和葡萄牙在美洲的殖民帝国瓦解。海地革命导致海地于 &lt;/ins&gt;1804 &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;年独立，这是该地区自治愿望的首次突出表现。它是拉丁美洲第一个获得独立的国家，也是第一个由前奴隶管理的共和国。随后，独立运动蔓延开来，西蒙-玻利瓦尔和何塞-德-圣马丁等标志性人物在摆脱西班牙殖民统治的斗争中发挥了核心作用。巴西于 &lt;/ins&gt;1822 &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;年宣布独立，彼得一世即位后，巴西与葡萄牙和平分离，这也是该地区转型的标志。然而，最令欧洲列强震惊的是西班牙大片殖民地的解放，其中一些列强正在考虑重新介入该地区的可能性。美国本身在 18 世纪末也曾为争取独立而与殖民国家进行过斗争，因此它对这些解放运动持积极态度，这不仅是出于意识形态方面的考虑，也是出于战略方面的考虑。通过制定门罗主义，他们试图阻止欧洲列强重返拉丁美洲。这一理论的形式是申明美洲应不受欧洲的任何干涉或再殖民化。然而，在表面声援拉丁美洲新独立国家的背后，还有一个战略层面。美国热衷于保障自身安全和扩大势力范围，不希望在其家门口出现强大的欧洲势力。门罗主义 &amp;quot;在作为抵御欧洲帝国主义的盾牌的同时，也标志着美国开始成为西半球的主导力量。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;   &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;   &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The Monroe Doctrine, enunciated in 1823, was a major turning point in American foreign policy. It was based on two fundamental principles: non-colonisation and non-intervention. In other words, the message sent to the European powers was clear: the New World was no longer open to European colonisation, and any attempt to intervene or interfere in the affairs of the nations of the American continent would be considered a hostile act towards the United States. Alaska, then under Russian control, is a pertinent example of the scope of this doctrine. Although Alaska is not explicitly mentioned in the Monroe Doctrine, its spirit also applied to this region. The United States was concerned about the Russian presence in North America, seeing it as an extension of European influence. Ultimately, these concerns dissipated when the United States acquired Alaska from Russia in 1867, thus eliminating a significant European presence on the continent. As for Latin America, the Monroe Doctrine established an informal US protectorate over the region. At a time when most Latin American nations had just gained or were in the process of gaining their independence from the European colonial powers, the United States, through this doctrine, wanted to prevent another European power from taking over. By proclaiming itself to be the principal protector of the nations of Latin America, the United States also sought to assert its hegemony over the continent. The Monroe Doctrine, although largely one&lt;/del&gt;-&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;sided in its formulation, established a guideline for American policy in America for almost a century. It was invoked on several occasions, notably during the American intervention in Cuba in 1898, and laid the foundations for Franklin D. Roosevelt's &lt;/del&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Good Neighbour&lt;/del&gt;&amp;quot; &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;policy in the 1930s.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;门罗主义于1823年提出，是美国外交政策的一个重要转折点。它基于两个基本原则：非殖民化和不干涉。换句话说，向欧洲列强发出的信息很明确：新大陆不再对欧洲殖民开放，任何干预或干涉美洲大陆国家事务的企图都将被视为对美国的敌对行为。当时在俄国控制下的阿拉斯加就是这一理论适用范围的一个相关例子。尽管门罗主义没有明确提及阿拉斯加，但其精神同样适用于这一地区。美国担心俄罗斯在北美的存在，将其视为欧洲影响力的延伸。最终，1867 年美国从俄国手中获得阿拉斯加，从而消除了欧洲在北美大陆的重要存在，这些担忧也随之烟消云散。至于拉丁美洲，门罗主义确立了美国在该地区的非正式保护国地位。当时，大多数拉美国家刚刚或正在从欧洲殖民国家手中获得独立，美国希望通过这一理论防止另一个欧洲强国接管该地区。通过宣称自己是拉丁美洲国家的主要保护者，美国还试图维护其在拉丁美洲的霸权地位。门罗主义虽然在很大程度上是片面的，但却为美国近一个世纪的美洲政策确立了指导方针。它曾多次被援引，特别是在 1898 年美国干预古巴期间，并为 20 世纪 30 年代富兰克林&lt;/ins&gt;-&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;罗斯福的 &lt;/ins&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;睦邻 &lt;/ins&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;政策奠定了基础。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The Monroe Doctrine, although primarily aimed at protecting the Western Hemisphere from European influence and intervention, also included a dimension that reflected the United States' traditional isolationist foreign policy stance. James Monroe, in his speech to Congress in 1823, made it clear that the United States would not meddle in European affairs or wars, and in return expected Europe not to meddle in the affairs of the Western Hemisphere. This reciprocity was intended to establish a clear separation between the European and American spheres of influence. Isolationism, as an underlying philosophy, was a feature of American policy for much of the 19th century. This manifested itself not only in the Monroe Doctrine, but also in other policy decisions and speeches by leaders, including George Washington's famous warning against &lt;/del&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;permanent alliances&lt;/del&gt;&amp;quot; &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;in his Farewell Address. America, during this period, preferred to focus on internal development and westward expansion rather than becoming entangled in European conflicts and intrigues. It was only with the upheavals of the early 20th century, notably the First World War, that the United States began to turn away from its strict isolationism and adopt a more interventionist role on the world stage. The need to respond to global threats and the recognition of its own status as a world power gradually led the United States to reassess its position and commitment to world affairs.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;门罗主义的主要目的是保护西半球免受欧洲的影响和干涉，但也包含了反映美国传统孤立主义外交政策立场的内容。詹姆斯-门罗在1823年向国会发表的演讲中明确表示，美国不会干涉欧洲事务或战争，作为回报，他希望欧洲不要干涉西半球事务。这种互惠关系旨在明确划分欧洲和美国的势力范围。在 19 世纪的大部分时间里，孤立主义是美国政策的基本理念。这不仅体现在门罗主义中，也体现在其他政策决定和领导人的讲话中，包括乔治-华盛顿在《告别演说》中对 &lt;/ins&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;永久联盟 &lt;/ins&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;的著名警告。在此期间，美国更愿意专注于内部发展和向西扩张，而不是卷入欧洲的冲突和阴谋。直到20世纪初的动荡，特别是第一次世界大战，美国才开始摆脱严格的孤立主义，在世界舞台上扮演更加干预的角色。应对全球威胁的需要以及对自身世界大国地位的认可，逐渐促使美国重新评估其在世界事务中的立场和承诺。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;When it was proclaimed, the Monroe Doctrine was greeted with some indifference by the major European powers. At the time, the United States was far from being the superpower it would become in the 20th century. Indeed, in 1823, they were mainly preoccupied with their domestic affairs, including westward expansion and emerging tensions over slavery. Britain, with its vast navy and extensive colonies, was the dominant player in the New World. It perceived the United States as a secondary player and was therefore not particularly concerned by Monroe's statements, especially as it had a vested interest in maintaining the status quo in Latin America, where it had significant commercial investments. However, it should be noted that although the Monroe Doctrine was largely ignored initially, it became more relevant over time. As US power grew, the doctrine became a central element of US foreign policy in Latin America. In practice, the Monroe Doctrine provided a justification for many US interventions in the region throughout the 19th and 20th centuries. The doctrine also became more respected as American power began to surpass that of some European powers in the region. With the rise of the United States as an economic and military power at the end of the 19th century, the Monroe Doctrine became a more concrete and imposing reality for European nations.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;门罗主义一经宣布，就受到欧洲大国的冷遇。当时，美国还远未成为 20 世纪的超级大国。事实上，在1823年，他们主要忙于国内事务，包括西进扩张和新出现的奴隶制紧张局势。英国拥有庞大的海军和广阔的殖民地，在新世界占据主导地位。英国将美国视为次要角色，因此对门罗的声明并不特别在意，尤其是因为英国在拉丁美洲拥有大量商业投资，维持拉丁美洲的现状符合英国的既得利益。然而，应该指出的是，尽管门罗主义最初在很大程度上被忽视，但随着时间的推移，它变得越来越重要。随着美国国力的增长，该理论成为美国在拉美外交政策的核心要素。实际上，在整个 19 世纪和 20 世纪，门罗主义为美国在该地区的许多干预行动提供了理由。随着美国在该地区的实力开始超过一些欧洲强国，门罗主义也越来越受到尊重。19 世纪末，随着美国作为经济和军事强国的崛起，门罗主义对欧洲国家来说成为了一个更加具体和强势的现实。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;   &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;   &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The Monroe Doctrine, although initially conceived as a declaration of protection for the Americas against European colonialism, laid the foundations for a more active and interventionist role for the United States in international affairs. It symbolised the beginning of the United States' transition from a young and largely isolated nation to a major world power. The War with Mexico (1846&lt;/del&gt;-1848&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;) was an early example of this, in which the United States acquired significant territory, including California and Texas. The Spanish-American War of 1898 was also a turning point, with the US establishing its influence over territories such as Puerto Rico, Guam and the Philippines. The twentieth century saw the United States take an increasingly central role on the world stage. American intervention in the two world wars strengthened its position as one of the world's leading powers. The post-Second World War era saw the United States and the Soviet Union emerge as the world's two superpowers, triggering the Cold War and a series of indirect ideological, political and military confrontations across the globe. Strategies of containment and détente were employed throughout the Cold War, with American interventions in places such as Korea and Vietnam, and clandestine actions in Latin America, Asia and the Middle East. The end of the Cold War did not mean the end of American involvement abroad. The United States continued to intervene in regions of the world to protect its interests, combat terrorism, promote democracy or respond to humanitarian crises. However, like any power, US actions have been subject to criticism, whether for their methods or for the perceived motives behind some of their interventions. The complexity of American foreign policy and the many interventions carried out in the name of various motives continue to be analysed and debated by historians, political scientists and the public alike.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;门罗主义虽然最初被认为是保护美洲免受欧洲殖民主义之害的宣言，但它为美国在国际事务中扮演更加积极和干预性的角色奠定了基础。它标志着美国开始从一个年轻的、基本上孤立的国家转变为世界大国。与墨西哥的战争（1846&lt;/ins&gt;-1848 &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;年）是这方面的早期例子，美国在这场战争中获得了包括加利福尼亚州和得克萨斯州在内的大片领土。1898 年的美西战争也是一个转折点，美国在波多黎各、关岛和菲律宾等领土上建立了自己的影响力。二十世纪，美国在世界舞台上扮演着越来越重要的角色。美国对两次世界大战的干预加强了其作为世界主要强国之一的地位。第二次世界大战后，美国和苏联成为世界上两个超级大国，引发了冷战以及全球范围内一系列间接的意识形态、政治和军事对抗。在整个冷战期间，美国采取了遏制和缓和战略，在朝鲜和越南等地进行了干预，并在拉丁美洲、亚洲和中东采取了秘密行动。冷战的结束并不意味着美国海外介入的结束。美国继续在世界各地进行干预，以保护其利益、打击恐怖主义、促进民主或应对人道主义危机。然而，与任何强国一样，美国的行动也会受到批评，无论是批评其干预方法，还是批评其某些干预行动背后的动机。历史学家、政治学家和公众对美国外交政策的复杂性和以各种动机为名实施的众多干预行动进行了分析和辩论。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;= 附件 =&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;= 附件 =&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Arthur</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://baripedia.org/index.php?title=%E7%BE%8E%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%AA%E6%B3%95%E5%92%8C_19_%E4%B8%96%E7%BA%AA%E6%97%A9%E6%9C%9F%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A&amp;diff=59958&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Arthur : /* 民族主义的复兴 */</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://baripedia.org/index.php?title=%E7%BE%8E%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%AA%E6%B3%95%E5%92%8C_19_%E4%B8%96%E7%BA%AA%E6%97%A9%E6%9C%9F%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A&amp;diff=59958&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2023-08-14T07:59:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;auto&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;autocomment&quot;&gt;民族主义的复兴&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122;&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;tr class=&quot;diff-title&quot; lang=&quot;fr&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Version précédente&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Version du 14 août 2023 à 09:59&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l317&quot;&gt;Ligne 317 :&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Ligne 317 :&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;== 民族主义的复兴 ==&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;== 民族主义的复兴 ==&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;At the beginning of the 19th century, the United States was still seeking to assert itself on the international stage. Young and ambitious, it looked beyond its borders with the intention of expanding its territory. This ambition manifested itself in 1812 when the country declared war on Great Britain, hoping to extend its territory northwards into what is now Canada. However, the United States' territorial ambitions came up against British resilience and the determination of the Canadian colonists. The Province of Upper Canada, now Ontario, remained out of reach despite American efforts. In addition, British forces inflicted crushing defeats on the United States on their own soil, including the burning of the White House. Despite these military setbacks, the War of 1812 had positive implications for the United States. It served as a catalyst for a renewed sense of nationalism among its citizens. The collective experience of war welded Americans together, fostering a stronger national identity. Even if initial territorial ambitions had failed, the war proved that the United States, as a young nation, could stand up to a major colonial power and defend its sovereignty. This nationalist revival would shape the country in the years that followed, influencing its politics, culture and identity.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;19 世纪初，美国仍在寻求在国际舞台上确立自己的地位。年轻而雄心勃勃的美国将目光投向国境之外，意图扩大领土。1812 年，美国向英国宣战，希望将领土向北扩展到现在的加拿大。然而，美国的领土野心遇到了英国的顽强抵抗和加拿大殖民者的决心。尽管美国做出了努力，但上加拿大省（即现在的安大略省）仍然遥不可及。此外，英军还在美国本土惨败，包括烧毁白宫。尽管在军事上遭受了这些挫折，1812 年战争还是对美国产生了积极的影响。它促进了美国公民民族主义意识的复兴。战争的集体经历将美国人团结在一起，促进了更强烈的国家认同。即使最初的领土野心失败了，但战争证明，美国作为一个年轻的国家，能够对抗殖民大国并捍卫自己的主权。这种民族主义复兴将在随后的岁月里塑造美国，影响其政治、文化和身份认同。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;At the turn of the 19th century, the United States was still a young nation, shaping its identity and asserting its position on the world stage. In this context, the War of 1812 with Great Britain was a decisive turning point for American national sentiment. The powerful British navy, with its ability to control the seas, imposed a devastating blockade along the American coast. This not only hampered American trade, but also profoundly affected the country's economy. Without a robust navy to defend its waters, the United States found itself in a vulnerable position. Ports that had once been bustling were now silent, with commercial vessels being stopped or captured, causing harm to merchants and entrepreneurs. Moreover, this maritime powerlessness created a sense of oppression among the population, making them feel trapped and dominated by an outside power. However, instead of breaking the spirit of the Americans, these trials had the opposite effect. In the face of external adversity, the nation rallied with renewed determination. Economic deprivation and foreign threats fuelled a collective desire for autonomy, independence and resilience. Out of this sense of oppression came national solidarity, a sense of belonging and pride in being American. The war, with its challenges and trials, thus played a crucial role in strengthening the American national identity and defining its indomitable spirit in the face of adversity.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;19 世纪之交，美国仍是一个年轻的国家，正在塑造自己的身份并在世界舞台上确立自己的地位。在此背景下，1812 年与英国的战争成为美国民族情绪的决定性转折点。强大的英国海军凭借其控制海洋的能力，对美国海岸实施了毁灭性的封锁。这不仅阻碍了美国的贸易，也对美国的经济产生了深远影响。没有强大的海军保卫自己的水域，美国发现自己处于弱势地位。曾经熙熙攘攘的港口如今一片死寂，商船被拦截或捕获，给商人和企业家造成了伤害。此外，这种海上无力感在民众中造成了一种压迫感，使他们感到被外来势力所困和支配。然而，这些考验非但没有击垮美国人的斗志，反而产生了相反的效果。面对外部逆境，美国人重新振作起来。经济贫困和外来威胁激发了美国人对自主、独立和坚韧的集体渴望。从这种压迫感中产生了民族团结、归属感和身为美国人的自豪感。因此，这场充满挑战和考验的战争在加强美国的民族认同感和确定其在逆境中不屈不挠的精神方面发挥了至关重要的作用。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The War of &lt;/del&gt;1812 &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;is often seen in terms of relations between the United States and Great Britain, but the real victims of this conflict were the Indian nations of the Great Lakes region. Despite the efforts of Aboriginal nations to protect their lands and ways of life, the peace treaties that followed the war paved the way for aggressive American expansion. With increased access to Indian lands, American settlers, driven by visions of expansion and prosperity, invaded these regions, often with brutal violence. This invasion was not just about territory; it was also about culture. The penetration of these territories led to conflict, displacement and the loss of ancestral traditions for the indigenous peoples. Pushed off their lands, many Indian nations were forced to migrate westwards, far from their homes and sacred lands. This period in American history remains a dark chapter of brutality and injustice towards indigenous peoples. Meanwhile, in the United States, the outcome of the war led to a strong sense of nationalism and self-confidence. Artists glorified the American landscape, infusing the popular imagination with the myth of an idyllic agrarian society. What's more, the embargo imposed by the British stimulated an industrial boom, particularly on the east coast, where new factories sprang up to rival the European industrial powers. This period therefore marked a turning point for the developing nation, establishing both its economic confidence and its cultural identity, but at a tragic cost to the indigenous peoples.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;1812 &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;年战争通常从美国和英国的关系角度来看待，但这场冲突的真正受害者是五大湖区的印第安民族。尽管原住民努力保护自己的土地和生活方式，但战后签订的和平条约为美国的侵略扩张铺平了道路。随着越来越多的人进入印第安人的土地，美国定居者在扩张和繁荣愿景的驱使下入侵这些地区，并经常使用残酷的暴力。这种入侵不仅关乎领土，还关乎文化。对这些领土的渗透导致了冲突、流离失所以及土著人民祖先传统的丧失。许多印第安民族被赶出自己的土地，被迫向西迁移，远离自己的家园和圣地。美国历史上的这段时期仍然是土著人民遭受残暴和不公正待遇的黑暗篇章。与此同时，在美国，战争的结果导致了强烈的民族主义和自信心。艺术家们美化了美国的风景，将田园诗般的农业社会神话注入了大众的想象中。此外，英国实施的禁运刺激了工业繁荣，尤其是在东海岸，新工厂如雨后春笋般涌现，足以与欧洲工业强国相媲美。因此，这一时期标志着这个发展中国家的转折点，既建立了经济自信，又确立了文化身份，但土著人民却为此付出了惨痛的代价。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The War of &lt;/del&gt;1812&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;, although largely forgotten in the grand narrative of American history, played a decisive role in shaping the nation. Faced with the rigours of a blockade imposed by the British, the United States had to look for internal solutions to meet its growing needs. This necessity proved to be the mother of invention, spawning an industrial revolution on the East Coast. Textile mills sprang up, taking advantage of abundant natural resources and American ingenuity. At the same time, metallurgy and armaments grew, transforming the nation into a burgeoning industrial power. This economic change not only strengthened the material structures of the United States, it also brought about a cultural transformation. With industry flourishing, Americans began to see their country in a new light, no longer as a young colony struggling to define itself, but as a mature nation, capable of competing with the European powers. Artists, capturing this spirit of renewal and confidence, painted idyllic scenes of the American countryside, depicting a robust agrarian society that, despite its turn towards industrialisation, remained deeply rooted in its fundamental values. In this way, the War of 1812, with its challenges and triumphs, not only shaped the economic trajectory of the United States, but also influenced its culture and national identity, leaving a lasting legacy that continues to resonate today.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;1812 &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;年战争虽然在美国历史的宏大叙事中大多被遗忘，但在塑造美国的过程中起到了决定性的作用。面对英国的严厉封锁，美国不得不寻求内部解决方案来满足日益增长的需求。事实证明，需求是发明之母，它催生了东海岸的工业革命。利用丰富的自然资源和美国人的聪明才智，纺织厂如雨后春笋般涌现。与此同时，冶金和武器装备也得到了发展，使美国成为一个新兴的工业强国。这一经济变革不仅加强了美国的物质结构，还带来了文化变革。随着工业的蓬勃发展，美国人开始以新的眼光看待自己的国家，不再把它看作是一个挣扎着自我定位的年轻殖民地，而是一个能够与欧洲列强竞争的成熟国家。艺术家们捕捉到了这种复兴和自信的精神，描绘了美国乡村的田园风光，描绘了一个强大的农业社会，尽管它转向了工业化，但其基本价值观依然根深蒂固。因此，1812 年战争及其挑战和胜利不仅塑造了美国的经济轨迹，还影响了美国的文化和民族认同，留下了持久的遗产，至今仍能引起人们的共鸣。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The War of &lt;/del&gt;1812&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;, despite its name, left an indelible mark on the national trajectory of the United States far beyond the battlefield. Its repercussions extended to areas that might seem, at first glance, far removed from military confrontations. For example, it has stimulated a major reappraisal of the country's infrastructure, while highlighting the need for robust public policies. Faced with a Europe rich in knowledge and advanced in education, American leaders understood that to secure a place on the world stage, they had to invest in education. Consequently, the emphasis was placed on creating schools and universities. Similarly, public health became a key concern, leading to investment in hospitals and health initiatives. The need for rapid communication and increased mobility led to improvements in transport infrastructure, with the development of roads, canals and, later, railways. This led to economic expansion, but also to cultural expansion, linking the different regions of the country. Architecturally, a new aesthetic emerged, inspired by the classical ideals of Greece and Rome. Although Thomas Jefferson played a role in popularising this neoclassical style, it should be noted that he did not design the White House. However, his own estate, Monticello, is a remarkable example of this Greco&lt;/del&gt;-&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Roman influence. These buildings, with their majestic columns and harmonious proportions, were not only aesthetically pleasing, they also symbolised the democratic ideals and grandeur of the young republic. Thus, beyond its military and political implications, the War of 1812 acted as a catalyst for the development of the United States, influencing the direction of its policies, infrastructure and culture for generations to come.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;1812 &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;年战争虽名为战争，但在战场之外的美国国家发展轨迹上留下了不可磨灭的印记。它的影响延伸到了一些乍看起来与军事对抗相去甚远的领域。例如，它激发了对国家基础设施的重大重新评估，同时凸显了对强有力的公共政策的需求。面对知识丰富、教育发达的欧洲，美国领导人明白，要想在世界舞台上占有一席之地，就必须投资教育。因此，创建学校和大学成为重点。同样，公共卫生也成为美国关注的重点，这导致了对医院和卫生举措的投资。对快速通信和增加流动性的需求导致了交通基础设施的改善，公路、运河以及后来的铁路都得到了发展。这不仅带来了经济扩张，也带来了文化扩张，将全国不同地区联系在一起。在建筑方面，出现了一种新的美学，其灵感来自希腊和罗马的古典理想。虽然托马斯&lt;/ins&gt;-&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;杰斐逊在推广这种新古典主义风格方面发挥了作用，但应该指出的是，白宫并不是由他设计的。不过，他自己的庄园蒙蒂塞洛却是这种希腊罗马风格影响的杰出典范。这些建筑有着雄伟的圆柱和和谐的比例，不仅美观大方，还象征着年轻共和国的民主理想和宏伟气魄。因此，除了军事和政治影响之外，1812 年战争还对美国的发展起到了催化剂的作用，影响了美国未来几代人的政策、基础设施和文化方向。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The War of &lt;/del&gt;1812&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;, although fought with mixed success on the ground, served as a wake-up call to the young American republic about the need for a well-trained professional army. In the period following that war, there was a growing realisation that, to be a sovereign and autonomous nation, the United States needed a military force capable not only of defending its borders, but also of asserting its influence. The West Point Military Academy, although founded before the outbreak of war, became a central symbol of this new approach to military preparation. The United States, having seen the weaknesses of its forces in the face of an experienced colonial power, realised that its army needed more structured and rigorous training. West Point was not just an institution where the art of war was learned. It embodied a fusion of military discipline with academic education, turning its graduates not just into soldiers, but also into exemplary thinkers, leaders and citizens. Cadets were immersed in studies ranging from military tactics to engineering, from mathematics to philosophy, while being trained to be defenders of the Constitution and American values. In this way, West Point became an iconic institution, illustrating the American commitment to military and academic excellence. It helped forge a more competent and professional American military, ready to meet the challenges of the nineteenth century and beyond, thereby strengthening the United States' position on the international stage.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;1812 &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;年战争虽然在实地取得的成功有好有坏，但却为年轻的美国共和国敲响了警钟，使其认识到需要一支训练有素的职业军队。战争结束后，人们逐渐意识到，美国要成为一个主权独立的国家，就需要一支不仅能保卫边境，而且能发挥影响力的军队。西点军校虽然成立于战争爆发之前，但却成为这种新军事准备方式的核心象征。美国看到了自己的军队在面对经验丰富的殖民国家时的弱点，意识到自己的军队需要更有条理、更严格的训练。西点军校不仅仅是一个学习战争艺术的机构。它体现了军事纪律与学术教育的融合，不仅将毕业生培养成士兵，还将他们培养成模范思想家、领导者和公民。学员们沉浸在从军事战术到工程学、从数学到哲学的学习中，同时被训练成为宪法和美国价值观的捍卫者。通过这种方式，西点军校成为一个标志性机构，诠释了美国对军事和学术卓越的承诺。它帮助打造了一支更有能力、更专业的美国军队，为迎接十九世纪及以后的挑战做好了准备，从而加强了美国在国际舞台上的地位。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;== &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The Monroe Doctrine &lt;/del&gt;==&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;== &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;孟禄主义 &lt;/ins&gt;==&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Fichier:James Monroe 01.jpg|thumb|right|200px|James Monroe.]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Fichier:James Monroe 01.jpg|thumb|right|200px|James Monroe.]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Arthur</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://baripedia.org/index.php?title=%E7%BE%8E%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%AA%E6%B3%95%E5%92%8C_19_%E4%B8%96%E7%BA%AA%E6%97%A9%E6%9C%9F%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A&amp;diff=59957&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Arthur : /* 宗教热情复苏，宗教活动增加 */</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://baripedia.org/index.php?title=%E7%BE%8E%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%AA%E6%B3%95%E5%92%8C_19_%E4%B8%96%E7%BA%AA%E6%97%A9%E6%9C%9F%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A&amp;diff=59957&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2023-08-14T07:57:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;auto&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;autocomment&quot;&gt;宗教热情复苏，宗教活动增加&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://baripedia.org/index.php?title=%E7%BE%8E%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%AA%E6%B3%95%E5%92%8C_19_%E4%B8%96%E7%BA%AA%E6%97%A9%E6%9C%9F%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A&amp;amp;diff=59957&amp;amp;oldid=59956&quot;&gt;Voir les modifications&lt;/a&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Arthur</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://baripedia.org/index.php?title=%E7%BE%8E%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%AA%E6%B3%95%E5%92%8C_19_%E4%B8%96%E7%BA%AA%E6%97%A9%E6%9C%9F%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A&amp;diff=59956&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Arthur : /* Society in the early 19th century */</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://baripedia.org/index.php?title=%E7%BE%8E%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%AA%E6%B3%95%E5%92%8C_19_%E4%B8%96%E7%BA%AA%E6%97%A9%E6%9C%9F%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A&amp;diff=59956&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2023-08-14T07:54:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;auto&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;autocomment&quot;&gt;Society in the early 19th century&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://baripedia.org/index.php?title=%E7%BE%8E%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%AA%E6%B3%95%E5%92%8C_19_%E4%B8%96%E7%BA%AA%E6%97%A9%E6%9C%9F%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A&amp;amp;diff=59956&amp;amp;oldid=59955&quot;&gt;Voir les modifications&lt;/a&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Arthur</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://baripedia.org/index.php?title=%E7%BE%8E%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%AA%E6%B3%95%E5%92%8C_19_%E4%B8%96%E7%BA%AA%E6%97%A9%E6%9C%9F%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A&amp;diff=59955&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Arthur : /* 权利法案 */</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://baripedia.org/index.php?title=%E7%BE%8E%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%AA%E6%B3%95%E5%92%8C_19_%E4%B8%96%E7%BA%AA%E6%97%A9%E6%9C%9F%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A&amp;diff=59955&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2023-08-14T07:53:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;auto&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;autocomment&quot;&gt;权利法案&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://baripedia.org/index.php?title=%E7%BE%8E%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%AA%E6%B3%95%E5%92%8C_19_%E4%B8%96%E7%BA%AA%E6%97%A9%E6%9C%9F%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A&amp;amp;diff=59955&amp;amp;oldid=59954&quot;&gt;Voir les modifications&lt;/a&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Arthur</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://baripedia.org/index.php?title=%E7%BE%8E%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%AA%E6%B3%95%E5%92%8C_19_%E4%B8%96%E7%BA%AA%E6%97%A9%E6%9C%9F%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A&amp;diff=59954&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Arthur : /* 司法权 */</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://baripedia.org/index.php?title=%E7%BE%8E%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%AA%E6%B3%95%E5%92%8C_19_%E4%B8%96%E7%BA%AA%E6%97%A9%E6%9C%9F%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A&amp;diff=59954&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2023-08-14T07:52:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;auto&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;autocomment&quot;&gt;司法权&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122;&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;tr class=&quot;diff-title&quot; lang=&quot;fr&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Version précédente&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Version du 14 août 2023 à 09:52&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l125&quot;&gt;Ligne 125 :&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Ligne 125 :&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;=== 司法权 ===&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;=== 司法权 ===&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The establishment of a strong judiciary was one of the visionary decisions taken at the Constitutional Convention of &lt;/del&gt;1787&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;. The Supreme Court of the United States occupies a central place in this judicial power. Over time, it has become an essential guardian of citizens' constitutional freedoms, while also serving as the final arbiter in legal disputes between the various branches of government and the states. The appointment of Supreme Court justices by the President, with the approval of the Senate, guarantees a democratic procedure for their selection. Their lifetime tenure reinforces the idea that these judges, once installed, should be shielded from current political turbulence. This protection allows them to devote themselves fully to interpreting the law without fear of reprisals or outside influence. The Court's ability to review and, if necessary, invalidate the actions of the legislature or the executive &lt;/del&gt;- &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;a practice known as judicial review &lt;/del&gt;- &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;is fundamental to the functioning of American democracy. It is through this mechanism that the Court can ensure that all government actions remain consistent with the Constitution, thereby preserving the integrity of the nation's founding document. The design of this Court, and the powers and responsibilities conferred upon it, embody the genius of the American system of checks and balances. This system ensures that no branch of government acquires absolute power, thereby protecting the rights and liberties of citizens and ensuring the durability of the democratic principles on which the nation was founded.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;建立强有力的司法机构是 &lt;/ins&gt;1787 &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;年制宪会议上做出的具有远见卓识的决定之一。美国最高法院在这一司法权中占据核心地位。随着时间的推移，它已成为公民宪法自由的重要守护者，同时也是政府各部门和各州之间法律纠纷的最终仲裁者。最高法院大法官由总统任命，经参议院批准，这保证了大法官的民主遴选程序。他们的终身任期强化了这样一种理念，即这些法官一旦就职，就应免受当前政治动荡的影响。这种保护使他们能够全心全意地解释法律，而不必担心遭到报复或受到外界影响。法院审查立法机关或行政机关的行为并在必要时宣布其无效的能力&lt;/ins&gt;--&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;这种做法被称为司法审查--是美国民主运作的根本。正是通过这一机制，法院才能确保政府的所有行为都符合宪法，从而维护美国建国文件的完整性。法院的设计以及赋予它的权力和责任体现了美国制衡制度的精髓。这一制度确保政府的任何部门都不会获得绝对的权力，从而保护公民的权利和自由，并确保作为建国基础的民主原则的持久性。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The three-fifths compromise is one of the most controversial decisions taken at the Constitutional Convention. While it reflects the deep divisions and practical concerns of the delegates at the time, it also shows the extent to which the institution of slavery was embedded in the social, economic and political fabric of the young American nation. The details of this compromise were primarily economic and political, rather than moral. The Southern states, dependent on slavery, wanted their entire slave population to be counted when determining their representation in Congress. This would, of course, have considerably increased their political power. The Northern States, where slavery was less widespread, opposed this, believing that if slaves did not have the right to vote and were not considered full citizens, they should not be fully counted for representation. The three-fifths compromise was therefore an attempt to strike a balance between these divergent positions. However, it had the indirect consequence of strengthening the political power of the slave states for many years, giving them disproportionate influence over the presidency, Congress and, consequently, national politics. It is also important to note that this compromise, along with other provisions of the Constitution that perpetuated the institution of slavery (such as the clause on the non-prohibition of the slave trade prior to &lt;/del&gt;1808&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;), are often cited as evidence of the deeply flawed nature of the original Constitution. These clauses reflect the realities and compromises necessary at the time to create a stable union, but they also show how slavery was inextricably linked to the founding of the United States. The issue of slavery, and the tensions it generated, would ultimately culminate in the American Civil War of the 1860s.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;五分之三的妥协是制宪会议上最具争议的决定之一。它反映了当时代表们的深刻分歧和实际关切，同时也显示了奴隶制在年轻的美国国家的社会、经济和政治结构中的根深蒂固程度。这一妥协的细节主要是经济和政治方面的，而不是道德方面的。依赖奴隶制的南方各州希望在确定其在国会中的代表人数时，将其全部奴隶人口计算在内。这当然会大大增加他们的政治权力。奴隶制不那么普遍的北方各州反对这样做，认为如果奴隶没有选举权，不被视为正式公民，他们就不应该被全部计入代表人数。因此，五分之三的妥协方案试图在这些不同的立场之间取得平衡。然而，它的间接后果是在许多年里加强了蓄奴州的政治权力，使它们对总统、国会乃至国家政治拥有不成比例的影响力。同样重要的是要注意到，这一妥协以及宪法中使奴隶制永久化的其他条款（如 &lt;/ins&gt;1808 &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;年之前不禁止奴隶贸易的条款）经常被作为原始宪法存在严重缺陷的证据。这些条款反映了当时为建立一个稳定的联邦而必须面对的现实和作出的妥协，但也表明奴隶制与美国的建国有着千丝万缕的联系。奴隶制问题及其引发的紧张局势最终导致了 19 世纪 60 年代的美国内战。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The US Constitution, although recognised as a crucial founding document, was marked by compromises reflecting the deep divisions in 18th century American society, particularly around the issue of slavery. Specific clauses, such as the Fugitive Slave Clause, which stipulated that any escaped slave had to be returned to his owner, nationalised the institution of slavery. This meant that even states that had abolished slavery were legally obliged to participate in its perpetuation. These compromises had several major implications. Firstly, they legitimised and reinforced slavery by incorporating it into the constitutional document itself. Secondly, these arrangements exacerbated regional tensions between the Northern and Southern states, tensions that would culminate in the American Civil War. Even after the abolition of slavery, the consequences of these compromises persisted, with descendants of slaves fighting for their civil rights throughout the twentieth century. Today, the presence of these clauses in the original Constitution is often singled out to highlight inconsistencies between the nation's ideals of equality and freedom and the realities of slavery. However, it is crucial to recognise that the Constitution is a living document. Subsequent amendments, such as the 13th, 14th and 15th, sought to rectify some of the original injustices. But the impact of these compromises on American history and society remains profound and indelible.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;美国宪法》虽然被公认为重要的建国文件，但其妥协的特点反映了 18 世纪美国社会的深刻分歧，尤其是围绕奴隶制问题的分歧。具体条款，如《逃奴条款》，规定任何逃跑的奴隶都必须归还其主人，将奴隶制国有化。这意味着即使已经废除奴隶制的国家在法律上也有义务参与奴隶制的延续。这些妥协产生了几大影响。首先，它们通过将奴隶制纳入宪法文件本身，使奴隶制合法化并得到强化。其次，这些安排加剧了北方和南方各州之间的地区紧张局势，这种紧张局势最终导致了美国内战。即使在废除奴隶制之后，这些妥协的后果依然存在，奴隶的后代在整个 20 世纪都在为争取自己的公民权利而斗争。今天，人们常常挑出原始宪法中的这些条款，以强调国家的平等和自由理想与奴隶制现实之间的不一致。然而，重要的是要认识到宪法是一份有生命力的文件。随后的修正案，如第 13、14 和 15 条修正案，试图纠正最初的一些不公正现象。但这些妥协对美国历史和社会的影响仍然深远而不可磨灭。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;=== &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The issue of slavery &lt;/del&gt;===&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;=== &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;奴隶制问题 &lt;/ins&gt;===&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;At the Constitutional Convention of &lt;/del&gt;1787&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;, tensions between the Northern and Southern states over the issue of slavery necessitated compromises to forge a stronger union. To gain Southern support for the new Constitution, the Northern States agreed to the Fugitive Slave Clause. This provision obliged even those states that had abolished slavery to return any escaped slaves to their original owners in the South. This clause, designed to appease the Southern states, was clearly at odds with the ideals of freedom and equality proclaimed by the American Revolution. It not only reinforced the legal legitimacy of the institution of slavery, but also made it more difficult for enslaved people to escape to a better life in the free states of the North. This compromise, although strategic at the time for the formation of the new nation, showed the extent to which fundamental principles could be sacrificed in the name of national unity.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;在 &lt;/ins&gt;1787 &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;年的制宪会议上，北方和南方各州在奴隶制问题上关系紧张，因此有必要做出妥协，以建立一个更强大的联邦。为了争取南方对新宪法的支持，北方各州同意了 &amp;quot;逃奴条款&amp;quot;。该条款规定，即使是那些已经废除奴隶制的州，也有义务将任何逃跑的奴隶交还给他们在南方的原主人。这一旨在安抚南方各州的条款显然与美国革命所宣扬的自由和平等的理想相悖。它不仅加强了奴隶制在法律上的合法性，而且使被奴役者更难逃往北方自由州过上更好的生活。这一妥协虽然在当时对新国家的形成具有战略意义，但也表明了以国家统一的名义牺牲基本原则的程度。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;At the Constitutional Convention of &lt;/del&gt;1787&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;, in addition to other compromises on slavery, the Northern states agreed to postpone the ban on the importation of slaves from Africa until &lt;/del&gt;1808&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;. This decision, taken in the hope of securing the support of the Southern states for the new Constitution, had profound and lasting consequences. It allowed the transatlantic slave trade to continue for another twenty years, leading to the arrival of many more enslaved people from Africa. Even after &lt;/del&gt;1808&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;, although the slave trade with Africa was banned, the increasingly vigorous domestic slave trade continued. The southern states continued to buy, sell and move slaves within the country, particularly to the western and lower south territories, where plantation expansion required a large workforce. This internal trade only came to an end with the final abolition of slavery in &lt;/del&gt;1865&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;在 &lt;/ins&gt;1787 &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;年的制宪会议上，除了在奴隶制问题上的其他妥协之外，北方各州还同意将禁止从非洲进口奴隶的禁令推迟到 &lt;/ins&gt;1808 &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;年。这一决定是为了确保南方各州对新宪法的支持，但却产生了深远而持久的影响。它使跨大西洋奴隶贸易又持续了二十年，导致更多的非洲奴隶涌入。甚至在 &lt;/ins&gt;1808 &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;年之后，尽管与非洲的奴隶贸易被禁止，但日益活跃的国内奴隶贸易仍在继续。南方各州继续在国内买卖和贩卖奴隶，特别是向西部和南部下游地区贩卖奴隶，因为那里的种植园扩张需要大量劳动力。直到 &lt;/ins&gt;1865 &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;年最终废除奴隶制，这种国内贸易才宣告结束。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The compromises accepted by the Northern States at the Constitutional Convention of &lt;/del&gt;1787 &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;highlight the tensions and contradictions that existed at the heart of the young American republic on the issue of slavery. While the ideals of freedom and equality were proclaimed as the foundations of the new nation, they coexisted with the maintenance and accommodation of the abhorrent practice of slavery. These agreements reveal the complexity of the political, economic and social issues that lay behind every decision taken in drafting the Constitution. They also illustrate the challenges inherent in attempting to unite states with such divergent interests and cultures. The Northern states, although many were morally opposed to slavery, were often prepared to make concessions to ensure the cohesion and viability of the new union. These compromises, while facilitating the ratification of the Constitution and ensuring a degree of initial stability, left fundamental questions unanswered which, in the end, were only answered through a bloody civil war decades later.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;北方各州在 &lt;/ins&gt;1787 &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;年制宪会议上接受的妥协方案凸显了年轻的美国共和国在奴隶制问题上存在的紧张和矛盾。虽然自由和平等的理想被宣布为新国家的基础，但它们与维持和容纳令人憎恶的奴隶制做法并存。这些协议揭示了政治、经济和社会问题的复杂性，而这些问题正是起草宪法时所做出的每项决定背后的原因。它们还说明了试图将利益和文化如此不同的各州联合起来所固有的挑战。北方各州虽然有许多在道义上反对奴隶制，但为了确保新联盟的凝聚力和可行性，它们往往准备做出让步。这些妥协虽然促进了《宪法》的批准并确保了一定程度的初期稳定，但却留下了一些根本性的问题没有得到解决，而这些问题最终只能在几十年后的一场血腥内战中找到答案。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;=== &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Tensions between the federal government and the states &lt;/del&gt;===&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;=== &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;联邦政府与各州之间的紧张关系 &lt;/ins&gt;===&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The Constitutional Convention of &lt;/del&gt;1787 &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;was a theatre of intense debate and crucial negotiations, far beyond the issue of slavery. At the heart of these deliberations was another fundamental dilemma: how to balance power between the central federal government and the individual states. This was a daunting challenge, reconciling the need for a strong central government capable of running an emerging nation with the desire of the states to preserve their autonomy and sovereignty. The subject of taxation was particularly controversial. After the experience of the Articles of Confederation, where the central government lacked funds and depended on voluntary contributions from the states, it was clear that a change was needed. However, there were concerns about giving the federal government the power to raise taxes. Many feared it would give too much power to the central government, potentially allowing a form of tyrannical authority. The smaller states were particularly concerned. They worried that if representation and taxation were based on population or wealth, they would be dominated by the interests of the larger, more populous and wealthier states. These fears led to the famous Connecticut Compromise or Great Compromise, which established a bicameral Congress: the House of Representatives, where representation would be based on population, and the Senate, where each state would have two senators, regardless of its size or population. In the end, the Convention succeeded in forging a series of compromises that, while imperfect, laid the foundations for a lasting constitution. It struck a delicate balance between central power and states' rights, a tension that continues to influence American politics to this day.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;1787 &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;年制宪会议是一场激烈辩论和关键谈判的舞台，远远超出了奴隶制问题的范畴。这些讨论的核心是另一个根本性难题：如何平衡中央联邦政府与各州之间的权力。这是一项艰巨的挑战，既需要一个强大的中央政府来管理一个新兴国家，又需要各州保持自治和主权。税收问题尤其具有争议性。根据《邦联条款》的经验，中央政府缺乏资金，只能依靠各州的自愿捐款，因此显然需要做出改变。然而，人们对赋予联邦政府加税的权力表示担忧。许多人担心这会赋予中央政府过大的权力，有可能形成一种专制权力。小州尤其担心。他们担心，如果代表权和税收以人口或财富为基础，就会被人口更多、更富裕的大州的利益所支配。这些担忧促成了著名的《康涅狄格妥协法案》或《大妥协法案》，该法案建立了一个两院制国会：众议院和参议院，前者的代表权以人口为基础，后者的代表权以人口为基础。最终，大会成功达成了一系列妥协，虽然并不完美，但为一部持久的宪法奠定了基础。它在中央权力和各州权利之间达成了微妙的平衡，这种紧张关系至今仍影响着美国政治。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The journey to ratification of the US Constitution was not an easy one. Following the 1787 Convention in Philadelphia, it was clear that while many supported the new Constitution, there was also strong opposition. The Anti-Federalists, as they were called, feared that the new Constitution would give too much power to the central government at the expense of the states and individual rights. For them, without explicit protections, there was a risk that the new government would become as tyrannical as the one the colonies had fought against during the American Revolution. In response to these concerns, and in order to build support for ratification, it was agreed that once the Constitution was ratified, the first Congress would propose a series of amendments to protect individual rights. These amendments would become what we know today as the Bill of Rights. The first ten amendments to the Constitution, collectively known as the Bill of Rights, were adopted in &lt;/del&gt;1791&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;. They guarantee a series of personal rights, such as freedom of speech, religion and the press, as well as protections against unfair legal proceedings. These rights have become fundamental to American political and legal culture. By adding the Bill of Rights to the Constitution, the Founding Fathers sought not only to guarantee the fundamental freedoms of American citizens, but also to allay the fears and anxieties of the Anti-Federalists. This gesture played an essential role in ensuring the ratification of the Constitution and the establishment of a stable and lasting government for the young American republic.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;美国宪法的批准之路并非一帆风顺。1787年费城会议之后，尽管许多人支持新宪法，但显然也有强烈的反对意见。被称为 &amp;quot;反联邦主义者 &amp;quot;的人担心新宪法会赋予中央政府过多的权力，从而牺牲各州和个人的权利。对他们来说，如果没有明确的保护措施，新政府就有可能变得像殖民地在美国革命期间所反对的政府一样专制。为了回应这些担忧，也为了争取对批准宪法的支持，人们同意，一旦宪法获得批准，第一届国会将提出一系列修正案来保护个人权利。这些修正案就是我们今天所熟知的《权利法案》。宪法》的前十项修正案统称为《权利法案》，于 &lt;/ins&gt;1791 &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;年获得通过。它们保障了一系列个人权利，如言论自由、宗教自由和新闻自由，以及免受不公平法律诉讼的保护。这些权利已成为美国政治和法律文化的基础。通过在《宪法》中加入《权利法案》，开国元勋们不仅寻求保障美国公民的基本自由，还试图减轻反联邦主义者的恐惧和焦虑。这一姿态在确保《宪法》获得批准以及为年轻的美国共和国建立稳定持久的政府方面发挥了至关重要的作用。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;These amendments, the first ten in the Constitution, were added in &lt;/del&gt;1791 &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;and gave individuals rights such as freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly and the right to a fair trial, among others. They also limit the powers of government and provide for the separation of powers and federalism.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;这些修正案是《宪法》中的前十条修正案，于 &lt;/ins&gt;1791 &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;年加入，赋予个人言论、宗教、新闻、集会自由以及公平审判权等权利。它们还限制了政府的权力，规定了三权分立和联邦制。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;== &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Bill of Rights &lt;/del&gt;==&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;== &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;权利法案 &lt;/ins&gt;==&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Fichier:Bill of Rights Pg1of1 AC.jpg|190px|thumb|The Bill of Rights.]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Fichier:Bill of Rights Pg1of1 AC.jpg|190px|thumb|The Bill of Rights.]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Arthur</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://baripedia.org/index.php?title=%E7%BE%8E%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%AA%E6%B3%95%E5%92%8C_19_%E4%B8%96%E7%BA%AA%E6%97%A9%E6%9C%9F%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A&amp;diff=59953&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Arthur : /* The limits of the Bill of Rights */</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://baripedia.org/index.php?title=%E7%BE%8E%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%AA%E6%B3%95%E5%92%8C_19_%E4%B8%96%E7%BA%AA%E6%97%A9%E6%9C%9F%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A&amp;diff=59953&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2023-08-14T07:50:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;auto&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;autocomment&quot;&gt;The limits of the Bill of Rights&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://baripedia.org/index.php?title=%E7%BE%8E%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%AA%E6%B3%95%E5%92%8C_19_%E4%B8%96%E7%BA%AA%E6%97%A9%E6%9C%9F%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A&amp;amp;diff=59953&amp;amp;oldid=59952&quot;&gt;Voir les modifications&lt;/a&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Arthur</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://baripedia.org/index.php?title=%E7%BE%8E%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%AA%E6%B3%95%E5%92%8C_19_%E4%B8%96%E7%BA%AA%E6%97%A9%E6%9C%9F%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A&amp;diff=59952&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Arthur : /* 权利法案 */</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://baripedia.org/index.php?title=%E7%BE%8E%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%AA%E6%B3%95%E5%92%8C_19_%E4%B8%96%E7%BA%AA%E6%97%A9%E6%9C%9F%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A&amp;diff=59952&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2023-08-14T07:48:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;auto&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;autocomment&quot;&gt;权利法案&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122;&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;tr class=&quot;diff-title&quot; lang=&quot;fr&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Version précédente&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Version du 14 août 2023 à 09:48&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l53&quot;&gt;Ligne 53 :&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Ligne 53 :&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;=== 权利法案 ===&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;=== 权利法案 ===&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The Bill of Rights, the first of ten amendments to the Constitution, was adopted in &lt;/del&gt;1791 &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;and was added to protect the individual rights of citizens against potential abuses of government power. The Bill of Rights was one of the most significant milestones in American constitutional history. Its creation proved essential in allaying the fears of Anti-Federalists, who worried that the newly drafted Constitution did not provide sufficient protections against an overly powerful central government.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;权利法案》是《宪法》十项修正案中的第一项，于 &lt;/ins&gt;1791 &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;年通过，旨在保护公民的个人权利，防止政府滥用权力。权利法案》是美国宪法史上最重要的里程碑之一。事实证明，《权利法案》的制定对于消除反联邦主义者的担忧至关重要，他们担心新起草的《宪法》没有提供足够的保护，以防止中央政府权力过大。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;While the Constitution established the powers of the federal government, the Bill of Rights acted as a counterweight by explicitly delineating what the government could NOT do, thereby ensuring the protection of citizens' rights and freedoms. These first ten amendments codified some of America's most cherished values.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;虽然《宪法》规定了联邦政府的权力，但《权利法案》明确规定了政府不能做的事情，从而起到了制衡作用，确保公民的权利和自由得到保护。前十条修正案将美国最珍视的一些价值观编纂成法典。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;# &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Freedom of speech, press, religion and assembly: These rights form the First Amendment and represent fundamental protections against censorship and religious persecution.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;# &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;言论、新闻、宗教和集会自由： 这些权利构成了第一修正案，是防止审查和宗教迫害的基本保障。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;# &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Right to bear arms: The oft-debated Second Amendment allows citizens to own arms, although the exact scope and limitations of this right continue to be a source of controversy.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;# &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;携带武器的权利： 经常引起争议的第二修正案允许公民拥有武器，但这一权利的确切范围和限制仍然存在争议。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;# &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Prohibition on housing troops: The Third Amendment prevents the government from forcing citizens to house soldiers during peacetime.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;# &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;禁止安置军队： 第三修正案禁止政府在和平时期强迫公民安置士兵。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;# &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Protection against unreasonable searches and seizures: The Fourth Amendment requires a warrant to search or seize property, thereby protecting the privacy of citizens.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;# &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;防止不合理的搜查和扣押： 第四修正案规定，搜查或扣押财产必须有搜查证，从而保护了公民的隐私。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;# &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Trial rights: These, enumerated in the Fifth, Sixth and Seventh Amendments, include the right against self-incrimination, the right to a speedy and public trial, and the right to a jury in criminal prosecutions.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;# &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;审判权： 第五、第六和第七修正案列举了这些权利，包括不自证其罪的权利、迅速公开审判的权利以及在刑事诉讼中获得陪审团的权利。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;# &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Protection against cruel and unusual punishment: The Eighth Amendment prohibits such practices, protecting the rights of defendants even after conviction.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;# &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;防止残忍和不寻常的惩罚： 第八修正案禁止此类做法，即使在定罪后也要保护被告的权利。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;# &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Protection of rights not explicitly enumerated: The Ninth and Tenth Amendments stipulate that rights not mentioned in the Constitution are retained by the citizens and that powers not delegated by the Constitution to the United States are reserved to the States.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;# &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;保护未明确列举的权利： 第九和第十修正案规定，《宪法》未提及的权利由公民保留，《宪法》未授予美国的权力由各州保留。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Over the years, the Bill of Rights has become a powerful symbol of America's commitment to individual liberties, providing both a roadmap for jurisprudence and an ideal towards which the nation should always strive.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;多年来，《权利法案》已成为美国对个人自由承诺的有力象征，既为法学提供了路线图，也为国家提供了应始终为之奋斗的理想。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;=== The limits of the Bill of Rights ===&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;=== The limits of the Bill of Rights ===&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Arthur</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://baripedia.org/index.php?title=%E7%BE%8E%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%AA%E6%B3%95%E5%92%8C_19_%E4%B8%96%E7%BA%AA%E6%97%A9%E6%9C%9F%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A&amp;diff=59951&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Arthur : /* 邦联条款》和各州宪法 */</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://baripedia.org/index.php?title=%E7%BE%8E%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%AA%E6%B3%95%E5%92%8C_19_%E4%B8%96%E7%BA%AA%E6%97%A9%E6%9C%9F%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A&amp;diff=59951&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2023-08-14T07:47:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;auto&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;autocomment&quot;&gt;邦联条款》和各州宪法&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122;&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;tr class=&quot;diff-title&quot; lang=&quot;fr&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Version précédente&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Version du 14 août 2023 à 09:47&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l30&quot;&gt;Ligne 30 :&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Ligne 30 :&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;面对这些挑战，以及意识到《宪法》条款可能过于局限，詹姆斯-麦迪逊（James Madison）和亚历山大-汉密尔顿（Alexander Hamilton）等当时的许多领导人都主张对现有制度进行彻底改革。这一认识最终促成了 1787 年费城制宪会议的召开。代表们决定彻底重新思考政府的结构，吸取过去的教训并预测未来的需求，而不是简单地修改宪法条款。由此产生的美国宪法在各州权力和联邦政府权力之间建立了平衡，引入了分权和制衡制度。它象征着美国思想的演变，从完全不信任中央权威到承认中央权威对国家凝聚力和繁荣的重要性。[[Fichier:Map Thirteen Colonies 1775-fr.png|thumb|upright=1.5|right|1775 年英属北美十三殖民地地图。]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;面对这些挑战，以及意识到《宪法》条款可能过于局限，詹姆斯-麦迪逊（James Madison）和亚历山大-汉密尔顿（Alexander Hamilton）等当时的许多领导人都主张对现有制度进行彻底改革。这一认识最终促成了 1787 年费城制宪会议的召开。代表们决定彻底重新思考政府的结构，吸取过去的教训并预测未来的需求，而不是简单地修改宪法条款。由此产生的美国宪法在各州权力和联邦政府权力之间建立了平衡，引入了分权和制衡制度。它象征着美国思想的演变，从完全不信任中央权威到承认中央权威对国家凝聚力和繁荣的重要性。[[Fichier:Map Thirteen Colonies 1775-fr.png|thumb|upright=1.5|right|1775 年英属北美十三殖民地地图。]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;   &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;   &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Following the victory over Britain and the achievement of independence, the original thirteen states, as well as Vermont, moved quickly to establish their own sovereignty and identity through individual constitutions. Each constitution was unique, sculpted by the social, economic and political particularities of each state. They were palpable manifestations of the diversity of thought and culture that characterised these newly independent states. However, despite their new-found independence and desire for autonomy, problems soon began to emerge. Trade disputes between states, an unstable currency, rebellions like Shays' and the threat of foreign intervention exposed the weaknesses of a system where inter-state collaboration was sporadic and often ineffective. These crises accentuated the need for a more coherent structure to guide the nascent nation.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;在战胜英国并实现独立后，最初的十三个州以及佛蒙特州迅速行动起来，通过各自的宪法确立了自己的主权和身份。每部宪法都是独一无二的，由每个州的社会、经济和政治特点雕琢而成。这些宪法充分体现了思想和文化的多样性，这也是这些新独立州的特点。然而，尽管这些国家刚刚获得独立并渴望自治，但问题很快就出现了。州与州之间的贸易纠纷、不稳定的货币、像谢斯（Shays）这样的叛乱以及外国干涉的威胁，都暴露了国家间合作时断时续且往往无效的制度的弱点。这些危机凸显了建立一个更加协调一致的结构来指导新生国家的必要性。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;=== 1787 年制宪会议 ===&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;=== 1787 年制宪会议 ===&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;当时的政治思想家和领导人，如詹姆斯-麦迪逊、亚历山大-汉密尔顿和乔治-华盛顿都明白，年轻的共和国要继续存在，就需要一个更加统一的框架，同时尊重各州的自治权。因此，1787 年在费城召开的制宪会议不仅是对《邦联条例》不足之处的反应，还代表了在一个平衡的联邦政府领导下建立一个统一国家的远大理想。最终产生的宪法成功地融合了这些理想，建立了一个联邦制度，明确划分了国家政府和各州的权力，保证了新共和国的自由和稳定。它成为美国未来发展的持久基础，同时尊重每个州的独特身份。&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;当时的政治思想家和领导人，如詹姆斯-麦迪逊、亚历山大-汉密尔顿和乔治-华盛顿都明白，年轻的共和国要继续存在，就需要一个更加统一的框架，同时尊重各州的自治权。因此，1787 年在费城召开的制宪会议不仅是对《邦联条例》不足之处的反应，还代表了在一个平衡的联邦政府领导下建立一个统一国家的远大理想。最终产生的宪法成功地融合了这些理想，建立了一个联邦制度，明确划分了国家政府和各州的权力，保证了新共和国的自由和稳定。它成为美国未来发展的持久基础，同时尊重每个州的独特身份。&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;美国宪法》的序言是一个简洁而有力的引言，阐述了起草这份建国文件的主要目的和愿望。其内容如下&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, to establish justice, to insure domestic tranquility, to provide for the common defense, to promote the general welfare, and to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.&lt;/del&gt;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Each sentence in the preamble carries a specific intention:&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;美国宪法》的序言是一个简洁而有力的引言，阐述了起草这份建国文件的主要目的和愿望。其内容如下&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;我们合众国人民，为了组成一个更完美的联盟，为了建立正义，为了确保国内安宁，为了提供共同防御，为了促进普遍福利，为了确保我们自己和我们的子孙后代享有自由的福佑，特制定并确立本《美利坚合众国宪法》&lt;/ins&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;。&lt;/ins&gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;序言中的每一句话都蕴含着特定的意图：&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;* &amp;quot;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Form a more perfect union&lt;/del&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;: Refers to the need for greater cohesion and collaboration between the states, a lesson learned from the shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;* &amp;quot;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;组成一个更完美的联盟&lt;/ins&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;： 指各州之间需要更大的凝聚力和协作，这是从《邦联条款》的缺陷中吸取的教训。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;* &amp;quot;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Establish justice&amp;quot;: Establish a fair and uniform legal system nationwide, guaranteeing equality before the law.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;* &amp;quot;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;建立正义 在全国范围内建立公正统一的法律体系，保障法律面前人人平等。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;* &amp;quot;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Ensuring internal tranquillity&lt;/del&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;: Protecting citizens against internal disturbances and guaranteeing civil peace.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;* &amp;quot;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;确保内部安宁&lt;/ins&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;： 保护公民免受内乱，保障国内和平。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;* &amp;quot;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;To provide for the common defence: To ensure national security against external threats.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;* &amp;quot;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;共同防御： 确保国家安全，抵御外部威胁。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;* &amp;quot;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;To promote the general welfare&lt;/del&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;: To foster the economic, social and cultural progress and well-being of all citizens.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;* &amp;quot;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;促进普遍福利&lt;/ins&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;：促进经济、社会和文化发展： 促进全体公民的经济、社会和文化进步与福祉。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;* &amp;quot;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;To secure the blessings of liberty for ourselves and our posterity&lt;/del&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;: To protect and preserve fundamental freedoms for present and future generations.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;* &amp;quot;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;确保我们自己和我们的子孙后代享有自由之福&lt;/ins&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;： 为今世后代保护和维护基本自由。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;As such, the Preamble not only serves as an introduction to the Constitution, but also sets the tone and purpose of the entire document, outlining the collective vision of a nation that aims to achieve these ideals for all its citizens.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;因此，序言不仅是对《宪法》的介绍，还为整部文件定下了基调和宗旨，勾勒出一个国家的集体愿景，旨在为所有公民实现这些理想。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;In the aftermath of the American Revolution, the United States, as a collection of newly free sovereign states, was at a crossroads. Each state had drawn up its own constitution and established a system of government that reflected not only the political preferences but also the social and cultural values of its inhabitants. These constitutions were the result of lively debate and compromise, drawing on various European traditions and the unique experiences of each state. Pennsylvania, for example, adopted a progressive model for its time, recognising universal suffrage for white male taxpayers. With its single assembly and collegiate executive, it sought to reduce concentrations of power and encourage broader participation by its citizens. In contrast, states such as Maryland maintained a more aristocratic social and political structure. Power there was in the hands of a landed elite. Landowners, by virtue of their social and economic status, exerted a dominant influence not only on the election of the governor, but also on the politics of the state as a whole. New Jersey offers a particularly fascinating example: it granted the right to vote not only to certain men, but also to women who met specific property criteria. This was an anomaly for the time, and showed just how much each state could vary in its conception of governance.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;在美国革命之后，美国作为一个新自由主权国家的集合体，正处于十字路口。每个州都制定了自己的宪法，并建立了一套政府制度，这套制度不仅反映了本州居民的政治倾向，也反映了他们的社会和文化价值观。这些宪法是激烈辩论和妥协的结果，借鉴了欧洲的各种传统和各州的独特经验。例如，宾夕法尼亚州采用了当时的进步模式，承认白人男性纳税人享有普选权。宾夕法尼亚州采用单一议会和合议制行政机构，力求减少权力集中，鼓励公民更广泛地参与。相比之下，马里兰州等州则保持着贵族化的社会和政治结构。那里的权力掌握在地主精英手中。土地所有者凭借其社会和经济地位，不仅对州长选举，而且对整个州的政治都产生了主导性影响。新泽西州提供了一个特别引人入胜的例子：它不仅赋予某些男性选举权，还赋予符合特定财产标准的女性选举权。这在当时是一个反常现象，表明了每个州在治理理念上的差异有多大。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;These variations, while enriching the political tapestry of the young nation, also exacerbated tensions between states. The need for effective coordination, a common currency, a unified defence and stable trade policies quickly became apparent. The fragmented and sometimes conflicting vision of power within each state posed a serious challenge to the unity and stability of the country. It was against this backdrop that the imperative need for a national constitution arose. The leaders of the day aspired to build a framework that, while respecting the sovereignty of the States, would establish a robust central government capable of addressing and navigating the complex challenges facing the nation.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;这些差异在丰富了这个年轻国家的政治结构的同时，也加剧了各州之间的紧张关系。对有效协调、共同货币、统一国防和稳定贸易政策的需求很快变得显而易见。各个国家各自为政，有时甚至相互冲突，这对国家的统一和稳定构成了严峻挑战。正是在这种背景下，制定一部国家宪法成为当务之急。当时的领导人希望建立一个框架，在尊重各州主权的同时，建立一个强大的中央政府，能够应对和驾驭国家面临的复杂挑战。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The dawn of the United States was marked by a mosaic of political systems and ideological beliefs. Each state had developed its own government, often in response to its own cultural, economic and geographical particularities. While these diverse systems in themselves reflected the rich experiences and aspirations of the colonies, they also introduced friction and complications when the states attempted to collaborate on national issues. For example, issues of inter-state trade and currency were hampered by sometimes divergent interests. A coastal state might favour customs duties to protect its goods, while a border state might seek to facilitate free trade with its neighbours. Similarly, without a strong central body to regulate the currency, states would issue their own currencies, leading to confusion and economic instability. Furthermore, external threats, whether potential invasions or diplomatic treaties, required a coherent response, something that a fragmented government could not effectively provide. Beyond the practical issues, there were also ideals at stake. The Founding Fathers aspired to a republic where human rights would be protected against the whims of tyrannical government, while ensuring that the same government had the authority to act in the interests of the common good. This delicate balance between individual liberty and the common good was at the heart of constitutional debates. So, in 1787, against the backdrop of these challenges and aspirations, delegates gathered in Philadelphia to draft the United States Constitution. Their vision: to create a federal government that would have the power to deal with national and international issues, while respecting the rights and sovereignty of the States. This Constitution, the product of compromise and vision, laid the foundations for a nation that, despite its heterogeneous beginnings, aspired to unity and a common destiny.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;美国诞生之初，各种政治制度和意识形态信仰林立。每个州都建立了自己的政府，通常是为了应对自身的文化、经济和地理特点。虽然这些不同的制度本身反映了殖民地的丰富经验和愿望，但当各州试图就全国性问题进行合作时，它们也带来了摩擦和复杂性。例如，国家间的贸易和货币问题有时会受到不同利益的阻碍。沿海国家可能倾向于征收关税以保护其商品，而边境国家则可能寻求促进与邻国的自由贸易。同样，如果没有一个强有力的中央机构来管理货币，各州就会发行自己的货币，从而导致混乱和经济不稳定。此外，外部威胁，无论是潜在的入侵还是外交条约，都需要协调一致的应对措施，而分散的政府无法有效做到这一点。除了实际问题外，理想也岌岌可危。开国元勋们渴望建立一个共和国，在这个共和国中，人权将受到保护，不受专制政府胡作非为的影响，同时确保同一政府有权为共同利益采取行动。个人自由与公共利益之间的这种微妙平衡是宪法辩论的核心。因此，1787年，在这些挑战和愿望的背景下，代表们聚集在费城起草美国宪法。他们的愿景是：建立一个有权处理国内和国际问题的联邦政府，同时尊重各州的权利和主权。这部宪法是妥协和远见的产物，它为一个国家奠定了基础，尽管这个国家的起源各不相同，但它渴望团结和共同的命运。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;=== &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The Bill of Rights &lt;/del&gt;===&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;=== &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;权利法案 &lt;/ins&gt;===&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;The Bill of Rights, the first of ten amendments to the Constitution, was adopted in 1791 and was added to protect the individual rights of citizens against potential abuses of government power. The Bill of Rights was one of the most significant milestones in American constitutional history. Its creation proved essential in allaying the fears of Anti-Federalists, who worried that the newly drafted Constitution did not provide sufficient protections against an overly powerful central government.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;The Bill of Rights, the first of ten amendments to the Constitution, was adopted in 1791 and was added to protect the individual rights of citizens against potential abuses of government power. The Bill of Rights was one of the most significant milestones in American constitutional history. Its creation proved essential in allaying the fears of Anti-Federalists, who worried that the newly drafted Constitution did not provide sufficient protections against an overly powerful central government.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Arthur</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://baripedia.org/index.php?title=%E7%BE%8E%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%AA%E6%B3%95%E5%92%8C_19_%E4%B8%96%E7%BA%AA%E6%97%A9%E6%9C%9F%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A&amp;diff=59950&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Arthur le 14 août 2023 à 07:46</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://baripedia.org/index.php?title=%E7%BE%8E%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%AA%E6%B3%95%E5%92%8C_19_%E4%B8%96%E7%BA%AA%E6%97%A9%E6%9C%9F%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A&amp;diff=59950&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2023-08-14T07:46:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122;&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;tr class=&quot;diff-title&quot; lang=&quot;fr&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Version précédente&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Version du 14 août 2023 à 09:46&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l17&quot;&gt;Ligne 17 :&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Ligne 17 :&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;}}&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;}}&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The United States Constitution, adopted in &lt;/del&gt;1787&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;, not only serves as the foundation of the American federal government, but also as a symbolic edifice that articulates and protects the rights and freedoms of its citizens. This fundamental charter has undergone &lt;/del&gt;27 &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;amendments since its adoption, demonstrating its ability to evolve in line with society's changing needs. In this course, we will explore the roots, developments and tensions surrounding this Constitution, particularly up to the tumultuous period of the Civil War from &lt;/del&gt;1861 &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;to &lt;/del&gt;1865&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;1787 &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;年通过的《美国宪法》不仅是美国联邦政府的基础，也是阐明和保护公民权利与自由的象征性大厦。自通过以来，这部基本宪章已经历了 &lt;/ins&gt;27 &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;次修订，表明其能够根据社会不断变化的需求而发展。在本课程中，我们将探讨围绕这部宪法的根源、发展和紧张局势，特别是直至 &lt;/ins&gt;1861 &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;年至 &lt;/ins&gt;1865 &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;年内战的动荡时期。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;But the study of this period does not stop with the Constitution. We will also delve into the political, religious and socio-cultural changes that culminated in the enunciation of the Monroe Doctrine in &lt;/del&gt;1823&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;. This doctrine, which stated that any European intervention in the New World would be seen as a threat, shaped American foreign policy for decades. By immersing ourselves in the America of the 1800s, we reveal the profound mechanisms that shaped the history of the United States and that continue, inescapably, to influence the face of the nation to this day.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;但对这一时期的研究并不止于宪法。我们还将深入研究政治、宗教和社会文化方面的变化，这些变化最终导致了 &lt;/ins&gt;1823 &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;年门罗主义的提出。门罗主义认为欧洲对新大陆的任何干涉都将被视为威胁，这一理论影响了美国几十年的外交政策。通过沉浸在 19 世纪的美国，我们揭示了塑造美国历史的深刻机制，这些机制至今仍不可避免地影响着美国的面貌。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;= &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The Articles of Confederation and the Constitutions of the various States &lt;/del&gt;=&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;= &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;邦联条款》和各州宪法 &lt;/ins&gt;=&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;=== &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The political and social stakes of independence &lt;/del&gt;===&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;=== &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;独立的政治和社会利害关系 &lt;/ins&gt;===&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Following the Declaration of Independence in &lt;/del&gt;1776&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;, a bold act that marked the American colonies' break with the British Crown, the newly independent states felt an urgent need to create a unified governmental structure. In response, in &lt;/del&gt;1777&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;, the Articles of Confederation were drafted and adopted by the thirteen founding states, establishing the first constitution of the United States. This fundamental charter was influenced not only by the desire for union and cooperation between the States, but also by a deep-rooted distrust of centralised government, a distrust shaped by decades of struggle against the oppressive grip of the British monarchy. The Articles sought to guarantee the sovereignty of each state while establishing a loose confederation, where a continental Congress held the power to make decisions on matters of national importance. However, this reaction against the British model of centralised governance left the Continental Congress relatively weak, with no authority to raise taxes or maintain a standing army, reflecting a caution about the possibility of tyrannical centralised power.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;1776 &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;年《独立宣言》的发表标志着美国殖民地与英国王室决裂，这一大胆的举动之后，新独立的各州感到迫切需要建立一个统一的政府结构。为此，13 个建国州于 &lt;/ins&gt;1777 &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;年起草并通过了《邦联条款》，制定了美国的第一部宪法。这一基本宪章不仅受到各州之间联合与合作愿望的影响，而且还受到对中央集权政府根深蒂固的不信任的影响，这种不信任是在数十年反抗英国君主专制压迫的斗争中形成的。这些条款旨在保障各州的主权，同时建立一个松散的邦联，由大陆会议掌握对国家重要事务的决策权。然而，这种对英国中央集权治理模式的反动使得大陆会议的力量相对薄弱，无权提高税收或维持常备军，这反映了人们对中央集权暴政可能性的警惕。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;In the tumultuous period following the American Revolution, the United States found itself in a delicate position as it sought to balance the lessons learned from its conflict with England with the needs of an emerging nation. The Articles of Confederation, although designed with the intention of avoiding the tyranny of a centralised power, such as they had experienced under the British Crown, proved insufficient to meet the demands of an expanding nation. The central government's inability to raise taxes rendered it powerless to meet the growing debts of war. The absence of an authority to regulate inter-state trade led to trade disagreements and economic tensions. In addition, without an effective mechanism to enforce laws at the federal level, the country often seemed more like a collection of individual nations than a unified union.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;在美国革命后的动荡时期，美国发现自己处于一个微妙的位置，因为它要在从与英国的冲突中吸取的教训与一个新兴国家的需求之间寻求平衡。尽管《邦联条款》的设计初衷是为了避免中央集权的暴政，就像他们在英国王室统治下所经历的那样，但事实证明它不足以满足一个不断扩张的国家的需求。中央政府无法提高税收，因此无力偿还日益增长的战争债务。由于缺乏监管国家间贸易的机构，导致贸易分歧和经济紧张。此外，由于没有有效的机制来执行联邦一级的法律，这个国家往往更像是一个单独国家的集合，而不是一个统一的联盟。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Faced with these challenges and the realisation that the Articles were perhaps too limiting, many of the leaders of the day, such as James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, argued for an overhaul of the existing system. This realisation culminated in the Constitutional Convention of &lt;/del&gt;1787 &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;in Philadelphia. Instead of simply amending the Articles, the delegates decided to completely rethink the structure of government, drawing on the lessons of the past and anticipating future needs. The resulting US Constitution created a balance between the powers of the states and those of the federal government, introducing a system of separation of powers and checks and balances. It symbolises the evolution of American thinking, from total distrust of central authority to recognition of its importance to the cohesion and prosperity of a nation.&lt;/del&gt;[[Fichier:Map Thirteen Colonies 1775-fr.png|thumb|upright=1.5|right|&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Map of the thirteen British colonies in North America in &lt;/del&gt;1775&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;.&lt;/del&gt;]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;面对这些挑战，以及意识到《宪法》条款可能过于局限，詹姆斯-麦迪逊（James Madison）和亚历山大-汉密尔顿（Alexander Hamilton）等当时的许多领导人都主张对现有制度进行彻底改革。这一认识最终促成了 &lt;/ins&gt;1787 &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;年费城制宪会议的召开。代表们决定彻底重新思考政府的结构，吸取过去的教训并预测未来的需求，而不是简单地修改宪法条款。由此产生的美国宪法在各州权力和联邦政府权力之间建立了平衡，引入了分权和制衡制度。它象征着美国思想的演变，从完全不信任中央权威到承认中央权威对国家凝聚力和繁荣的重要性。&lt;/ins&gt;[[Fichier:Map Thirteen Colonies 1775-fr.png|thumb|upright=1.5|right|1775 &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;年英属北美十三殖民地地图。&lt;/ins&gt;]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;   &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;   &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;Following the victory over Britain and the achievement of independence, the original thirteen states, as well as Vermont, moved quickly to establish their own sovereignty and identity through individual constitutions. Each constitution was unique, sculpted by the social, economic and political particularities of each state. They were palpable manifestations of the diversity of thought and culture that characterised these newly independent states. However, despite their new-found independence and desire for autonomy, problems soon began to emerge. Trade disputes between states, an unstable currency, rebellions like Shays' and the threat of foreign intervention exposed the weaknesses of a system where inter-state collaboration was sporadic and often ineffective. These crises accentuated the need for a more coherent structure to guide the nascent nation.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;Following the victory over Britain and the achievement of independence, the original thirteen states, as well as Vermont, moved quickly to establish their own sovereignty and identity through individual constitutions. Each constitution was unique, sculpted by the social, economic and political particularities of each state. They were palpable manifestations of the diversity of thought and culture that characterised these newly independent states. However, despite their new-found independence and desire for autonomy, problems soon began to emerge. Trade disputes between states, an unstable currency, rebellions like Shays' and the threat of foreign intervention exposed the weaknesses of a system where inter-state collaboration was sporadic and often ineffective. These crises accentuated the need for a more coherent structure to guide the nascent nation.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;=== &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The Constitutional Convention of &lt;/del&gt;1787 ===&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;=== 1787 &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;年制宪会议 &lt;/ins&gt;===&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Political thinkers and leaders of the time, such as James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and George Washington, understood that the continued existence of the young republic required a more unified framework, while respecting the autonomy of the states. So the Constitutional Convention of 1787 in Philadelphia was not just a reaction to the inadequacy of the Articles of Confederation; it also represented an ambitious vision of a united nation under a balanced federal government. The resulting Constitution successfully merged these ideals, creating a federal system in which powers were clearly divided between the national government and the states, guaranteeing freedom and stability for the new Republic. It became the enduring foundation on which the United States built its future, while respecting the distinct identities of each State.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;当时的政治思想家和领导人，如詹姆斯-麦迪逊、亚历山大-汉密尔顿和乔治-华盛顿都明白，年轻的共和国要继续存在，就需要一个更加统一的框架，同时尊重各州的自治权。因此，1787 年在费城召开的制宪会议不仅是对《邦联条例》不足之处的反应，还代表了在一个平衡的联邦政府领导下建立一个统一国家的远大理想。最终产生的宪法成功地融合了这些理想，建立了一个联邦制度，明确划分了国家政府和各州的权力，保证了新共和国的自由和稳定。它成为美国未来发展的持久基础，同时尊重每个州的独特身份。&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The Preamble to the US Constitution is a concise but powerful introduction, setting out the main aims and aspirations that motivated the drafting of this founding document. It reads as follows:&lt;/del&gt;&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, to establish justice, to insure domestic tranquility, to provide for the common defense, to promote the general welfare, and to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;Each sentence in the preamble carries a specific intention:&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;美国宪法》的序言是一个简洁而有力的引言，阐述了起草这份建国文件的主要目的和愿望。其内容如下&lt;/ins&gt;&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, to establish justice, to insure domestic tranquility, to provide for the common defense, to promote the general welfare, and to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;Each sentence in the preamble carries a specific intention:&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;* &amp;quot;Form a more perfect union&amp;quot;: Refers to the need for greater cohesion and collaboration between the states, a lesson learned from the shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;* &amp;quot;Form a more perfect union&amp;quot;: Refers to the need for greater cohesion and collaboration between the states, a lesson learned from the shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Arthur</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>