The theory of resources equality by Ronald Dworkin - Historique des versions

Arthur : /* The general idea */

2021-09-12T21:37:53Z

The general idea

← Version précédente		Version du 12 septembre 2021 à 23:37
Ligne 39 :		Ligne 39 :
	"Egalitarian" does not necessarily mean "progressive" because what Dworkin says has been easily picked up and shared by a whole bunch of conservatives with the principle of accountability, which is the principle that everyone is responsible for their choices.<ref>Cohen, G. A. (1989). On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice. Ethics, 99(4), 906–944. https://doi.org/10.1086/293126</ref><ref>BARRY, N. (2006). Defending Luck Egalitarianism. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 23(1), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2006.00322.x</ref><ref>Knight, C. (2013). Luck Egalitarianism. Philosophy Compass, 8(10), 924–934. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12077</ref>		"Egalitarian" does not necessarily mean "progressive" because what Dworkin says has been easily picked up and shared by a whole bunch of conservatives with the principle of accountability, which is the principle that everyone is responsible for their choices.<ref>Cohen, G. A. (1989). On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice. Ethics, 99(4), 906–944. https://doi.org/10.1086/293126</ref><ref>BARRY, N. (2006). Defending Luck Egalitarianism. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 23(1), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2006.00322.x</ref><ref>Knight, C. (2013). Luck Egalitarianism. Philosophy Compass, 8(10), 924–934. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12077</ref>

	For Dworkin, if we are at a disadvantage because of our choices, that is certainly an inequality, but it is not an injustice. There are situations that express forms of inequality, but that do not necessarily mean that there are injustices.		For Dworkin, if we are at a disadvantage because of our choices, that is certainly an inequality, but it is not an injustice. There are situations that express forms of inequality, but that does not necessarily mean that there are injustices.

	Dworkin tries to think of a theoretical model that allows us to consider two things, a form of redistribution that, on the one hand, as a good liberal, starts from the idea that individuals must be free to pursue their conception of the good, that is sensitive to differences in aspiration.<ref>Dworkin, Ronald. "[https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/bulr90&div=16&id=&page= Justice for hedgehogs]." BUL Rev. 90 (2010): 469.</ref> For Dworkin, the conception of justice must take this into account; on the other hand, it must be independent of initial endowments. This means that it considers on an equal footing people with and without a natural disability problem. A just model has to be one that tries to equalize injustices or inequalities that people are not responsible for, that is, a distribution that is independent of natural goods that is not a justice that rewards the able-bodied and burdens the unemployable (1). On the other hand, it is a distribution that considers the distinction between choice and circumstance (2).		Dworkin tries to think of a theoretical model that allows us to consider two things, a form of redistribution that, on the one hand, as a good liberal, starts from the idea that individuals must be free to pursue their conception of the good, that is sensitive to differences in aspiration.<ref>Dworkin, Ronald. "[https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/bulr90&div=16&id=&page= Justice for hedgehogs]." BUL Rev. 90 (2010): 469.</ref> For Dworkin, the conception of justice must take this into account; on the other hand, it must be independent of initial endowments. This means that it considers on an equal footing people with and without a natural disability problem. A just model has to be one that tries to equalize injustices or inequalities that people are not responsible for, that is, a distribution that is independent of natural goods that is not a justice that rewards the able-bodied and burdens the unemployable (1). On the other hand, it is a distribution that considers the distinction between choice and circumstance (2).

Arthur le 8 mars 2020 à 11:57

2020-03-08T11:57:30Z

← Version précédente		Version du 8 mars 2020 à 13:57
Ligne 1 :		Ligne 1 :
			{{Infobox Lecture
			\| image =
			\| image_caption =
			\| cours = [[Political Theory]]
			\| faculté =
			\| département =
			\| professeurs = [[Matteo Gianni]]<ref>[https://unige.ch/sciences-societe/speri/membres/matteo-gianni/ Page personnelle de Matteo Gianni sur le site de l'Université de Genève]</ref><ref>Concordia University, Faculty of Arts and Science - Department of Political Science. “Dr. Matteo Gianni.” Dr. Matteo Gianni, https://www.concordia.ca/artsci/polisci/wssr/all-guest-lecturers/matteogianni.html</ref><ref>Profil de Matteo Gianni sur ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/2010087511_Matteo_Gianni</ref><ref>Profil Linkedin de Matteo Gianni - https://www.linkedin.com/in/matteo-gianni-2438b135/?originalSubdomain=ch</ref><ref>[https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=QP7aLBAAAAAJ&hl=fr Matteo Gianni - Citations Google Scholar]</ref><ref>“Matteo Gianni - Auteur - Ressources De La Bibliothèque Nationale De France.” Data.bnf.fr, https://data.bnf.fr/fr/16166342/matteo_gianni/.</ref><ref>“Matteo Gianni: Università Degli Studi Di Udine / University of Udine.” Academia.edu, https://uniud.academia.edu/MatteoGianni.</ref>
			\| enregistrement =
			\| lectures =
			*[[What is political theory? Epistemological implications]]
			*[[What is political theory? Meta-ethical issues]]
			*[[The egalitarian theory of distributive justice by John Rawls]]
			*[[The theory of rights by Robert Nozick]]
			*[[The theory of resources equality by Ronald Dworkin]]
			*[[The theory of capabilities of Amartya Sen and Marta Nussbaum]]
			*[[The communitarian perspective]]
			*[[The multiculturalist perspective]]
			}}

	{{Translations		{{Translations
	\| fr = La théorie de l’égalité des ressources de Ronald Dworkin		\| fr = La théorie de l’égalité des ressources de Ronald Dworkin

Arthur : /* Some criticisms of chance egalitarianism */

2020-02-18T17:21:07Z