中東の言語、宗教、文化

ユルマズ・エズカンのコースに基づく。

Languages

Deutsch

Español Français Italiano

Português 中文（简体)

現代の中東：国家・国家・地域社会

中東の概念 ● 中東の言語、宗教、文化 ● 中東の帝国と国家 ● 中東の政治的・宗教的潮流

古代文明発祥の地であり、歴史的な交易路の交差点でもある中東地域は、言語、宗教、文化の多様性が際立っている。この多様性は、無数の民族、帝国、運動によって形成された豊かで複雑な歴史の賜物である。

言語的には、エジプトやサウジアラビアなどではアラビア語が主流であるが、中東ではさまざまな言語が混在している。ペルシャ語（ペルシャ語）は、ペルシャ帝国の遺産を反映するイランの言語の柱であり、トルコの公用語であるトルコ語はオスマン帝国の影響を物語る。1948年のイスラエル建国とともに独自の復活を遂げた祖先の言語ヘブライ語と、イラク北部からトルコ南東部にかけての地域で話されているクルド語が、言語的景観を完成させている。宗教的にはイスラム教が主流で、スンナ派とシーア派がある。西暦634年から644年まで在位したカリフ・オマルや、預言者モハメッドの娘婿アリーといった歴史上の人物が、これらの分裂の始まりを体現している。キリスト教はその起源から存在し、エジプトのコプト教徒のような共同体は政治的・社会的変化にもかかわらず存続してきた。イスラエルではユダヤ教が中心であり、イスラエル建国の中心人物であるダヴィド・ベン・グリオンのような歴史的人物がその例である。

中東文化は、こうした言語や宗教の多様性から深い影響を受けており、芸術、音楽、料理の表現に富んでいる。たとえば、複雑な幾何学模様のイスラム美術は、宗教的に禁止されている具象表現を反映している。オーム・カルスームなどのアイコンに代表されるアラブ古典音楽は、言語的な国境を越えて地域文化に影響を与えてきた。ラマダンやペルシャのノウルーズのような祭りは、宗教的・文化的伝統が絡み合って独自の慣習を形成してきた例である。

中東における言語の多様性

中東の言語的多様性は、その最も特徴的な特徴のひとつである：ウラル・アルタイ語族、インド・ヨーロッパ語族、セム語族である。

中東の言語パノラマ === ウラル・アルタイ語族

ウラル・アルタイ語族には、アジアの大部分と東ヨーロッパの一部で話されている言語が含まれます。中東の文脈では、この語族は主にトルコの公用語であるトルコ語に代表されます。トルコ語は、この地域におけるテュルク系民族の拡大とオスマン帝国の歴史的影響の証です。アゼルバイジャンやイランの特定のコミュニティで話されているアゼリ語などもこの語族に属する。インド・ヨーロッパ語族は、世界で最も大きく多様な語族のひとつで、ペルシア語、クルド語、アルメニア語などが含まれる。特にペルシャ語は、古代ペルシャ帝国と現代イランの言語であり、歴史的・文化的に重要である。イラク、イラン、シリア、トルコに広がるクルド人が話すクルド語と、アルメニアとアルメニアのディアスポラの言語であるアルメニア語が、この言語的な豊かさを完成させている。最後に、セム語族は中東の文脈において極めて重要である。アラビア語はコーランの言語であり、多くのアラブ諸国の共通語である。ヘブライ語はイスラエル建国とともに現代的なルネサンスを遂げた古代語であり、アラム語やアッシリア語などの他の言語も、それほど広く話されているわけではないが、歴史的・文化的に重要な意味を持つ。

このカラー地図は、中東で話されている言語と、その言語が優勢な地域の人口密度を示している。この地図では、言語族と当該地域の人口集中度によって言語を区別しています。

アラビア語の広がりと影響力

黄色の部分は、アラビア語が優勢な人口密集地域を表す。これにはエジプト、サウジアラビア、イエメン、ヨルダン、レバノンなどの国が含まれる。アラビア語はセム語族の主要言語であり、アラビア半島とそれ以外の地域で話されている。この地図は、アラビア語が優勢な地域を黄色で示しており、これらの地域の人口密度が高いことを示している。セム語族に属するアラビア語は、公用語であるだけでなく、中東における文化的・宗教的アイデンティティの重要な一部でもある。

アラビア語はアラビア半島以外にも広がり、特に7世紀以降のイスラム征服を通じて、この地域で最も影響力のある言語のひとつとなった。アラビア語は現在、中東と北アフリカの多くの国で話されている。数千年の文明を持つエジプトなどでは、アラビア語が古代エジプト語などの古代の言語に取って代わり、人口の大半を占める言語となっている。イスラム教発祥の地であり、メッカとメディナの2つの聖地があるサウジアラビアでは、アラビア語は宗教的にも文化的にも特に重要である。イエメンやヨルダンなど他の地域では、アラビア語本来の多様性を反映し、さまざまな方言で話されている。文化と宗教の多様性で知られるレバノンも、歴史を通じて多くの言語の影響を受け、アラビア語の方言がモザイクのように混在している。このように、アラビア語は日常的なコミュニケーション言語としてだけでなく、中東全域の文化や歴史の保存と継承に不可欠な役割を果たしていることを、この地図は裏付けている。

インド・ヨーロッパ語族とセム語族の言語モザイク

地図上の緑色の部分はインド・ヨーロッパ諸語の存在を示しており、中東の民族言語的・歴史的多様性を物語っている。例えば、ペルシア語はイランの公用語であり、文化的にも文学的にも大きな影響力を持っている。古代アケメネス朝まで遡ることができる言語であり、この地域の歴史の深さを物語っている。一方、クルド語は地理的に不連続な地域で話されており、主にトルコ、イラク、イラン、シリアなど、現代の国境にまたがるクルディスタンの山岳地帯で話されている。クルド語はクルド人の母国語であり、彼らは同化の圧力や地域の政治的変化にもかかわらず、自分たちの言語と文化を維持してきた。アルメニア語は、アルメニアとアルメニアのディアスポラで話されているもうひとつの重要なインド・ヨーロッパ語であり、20世紀初頭のアルメニア人大虐殺を含む歴史的激動にもかかわらず存続してきた。アルメニア語には、5世紀に作られた独自のアルファベットがあり、アルメニア人の民族的アイデンティティの重要な要素となっている。インド・ヨーロッパ諸語の「島」は、民族の地理的分布を表すだけでなく、中東を形成してきた複雑な移動と歴史的相互作用を反映している。言語は文化と集団の記憶のベクトルであり、その分布から、大きな変化のダイナミズムに彩られた地域における回復力、適応、文化保存の歴史を垣間見ることができる。

地図は、異なる赤の濃淡で象徴されるテュルク諸語が優勢な地域を強調している。これらの言語はウラル・アルタイ語族に属し、移住とテュルク帝国によって歴史と文化が大きく形成された民族によって話されている。トルコの国語であるトルコ語は、この語族を代表する最も顕著な言語であり、最盛期には中東、南東ヨーロッパ、北アフリカの広大な地域を支配していたオスマン帝国の遺産が直接もたらしたものである。オスマン帝国はその言語だけでなく、文化、行政、宗教的影響力を領土全体に広めた。アゼルバイジャンとイランの一部のコミュニティで話されているアゼリー語は、トルコ語に近縁で、この地域のテュルク系言語のもうひとつの重要な支流です。これらの共同体はトルコや他のテュルク系民族と文化的・歴史的なつながりを共有している。

ロシア、中央アジア、コーカサスの一部を含む隣接地域では、他のテュルク諸語が話されている。これらの言語は、それぞれ異なる言語ではあるが、その起源や歴史的発展が類似しているため、共通の特徴を有している。これらのテュルク諸語の存在は、中央アジアの草原地帯から遊牧民が移動し、中東を横断してこの地域に言語的・文化的に消えない足跡を残したことを物語っている。これらの言語とその話者は、現代の中東の民族的・文化的多様性において重要な役割を果たし続けている。

この地図では、茶色とグレーの濃淡で表されたコーカサス語やその他の少数言語が強調されており、中東の言語多様性の見落とされがちな側面を明らかにしている。これらの言語は、人口密度は低いものの、言語的・文化的多様性に富む地域の特徴である。コーカサス地方は、その言語の複雑さで特に注目に値する。独自の文字体系であるカルトヴェリ語を持つグルジア語のような言語は、この地域の固有言語です。独特な歴史と文化を持つグルジアは、言語がいかに国家の アイデンティティを凝縮しうるかを示す顕著な例である。

グルジア語に加えて、アブハジア語やオセチア語のような、 世界ではどこにも話されていない他のコーカサス系の言語があ る。これらの言語は、多くの場合、地理的・歴史的に孤立し ており、独自の言語的特徴を生み出しながら、生き残り、 独自に発展してきました。これらの言語の存続は、何世紀にもわたる政治的・社会的変化に直面したコーカサスの人々の文化的回復力を物語っている。一方、少数民族の言語は、小さなコミュニティで話されている言語であり、多くの場合、豊かな文化遺産と独特の伝統を反映しています。これらの言語は、話者の数という点では支配的ではないが、地域の文化的多様性と無形遺産を保護する上で重要な役割を果たしている。このように、地図上のコーカサス系言語と少数民族言語の分布は、中東が紛争と貿易の地域であるだけでなく、世界的な物語では見過ごされがちな、深い言語的・文化的豊かさを持つ地域であることを思い起こさせる。

この地図は単に言語的多様性のスナップショットではなく、入植、貿易、征服、文化の歴史も示唆している。中東における言語と民族の分布は、地理的要因、歴史的帝国、移動、政治的変化の影響を受けてきた。言語は文化の伝達手段として、このような複雑な力学を反映しており、それらを理解することは、この地域の豊かな歴史と文化を理解する上で不可欠である。地図上に表された言語は、単なるコミュニケーションの道具ではなく、それを話す文明の魂を体現している。それぞれの言語は文化的アイデンティティの反映であり、何世紀にもわたって紡がれてきた伝統、詩、物語、哲学を伝えている。たとえばペルシャ文学は、ハーフェズやルーミーのような詩人たちの作品によって特徴づけられ、彼らの出身地域だけでなく、世界の思想や文学にも影響を与えた。

テュルク系言語には、『デデ・コルクト』のような叙事詩があり、草原の遊牧民の価値観や物語を伝えている。コーカサス系言語には、征服や帝国に対する抵抗の証となる口承史がある。少数民族の言語でさえ、小さなコミュニティでしか話されていないかもしれないが、独特の文化の宝庫であり、支配的な文化とはしばしば異なる生活様式や信仰体系を知る窓を提供している。したがって、中東の言語地図は生きたモザイク画であり、それぞれの色は話者のグループだけでなく、人類の歴史における一章をも表している。移住、征服、交易がこの地域を形成してきたが、生き残ったのは言語と文化であり、その民族の物語を語り続けている。言語と文化は、過去、現在、未来をつなぐものであり、遺産を永続させ、現代の交流を通じて進化し続けている。

方言と少数言語：生きた文化遺産

中東の多数派言語における方言の多様性は、過小評価されがちな豊かさである。トルコ語を例にとると、学校で教えられ、メディアや政治で使われる標準語はあるが、多くの地方方言が共存し、トルコ各地の歴史や文化を反映している。これらの方言は、発音、語彙、文法に至るまで、標準語とはかなり異なることがある。アラビア語は、この方言の多様性を示す最も顕著な例のひとつでしょう。文学的なアラビア語、つまり現代標準アラビア語は普遍的に理解され、文章や正式な会話で使用されていますが、日常生活ではさまざまな方言が飛び交っています。これらの方言は、地理的な地域だけでなく、レバント地方におけるオスマン帝国、ペルシャ、フランスなどの歴史的な影響も反映している。クルド語もまた、クルマンドジ語、ソラニ語、ペヘレワニ語など、いくつかの主要な方言に分けられ、それぞれに地域的な変種がある。これらのクルド語の方言の違いは非常に大きく、別個の言語としての地位を主張することもある。アルメニア語については、標準アルメニア語はあるものの、世界中のアルメニア人がさまざまな方言を話しています。これらの主要言語に加え、中東には約20の少数言語が存在し、交流、移住、適応の複雑な人類の歴史を反映している。これらの言語は小さなコミュニティで話されているに過ぎないが、その歴史と文化は認識され、保存されるべきものである。このような言語学的に豊かな背景の中にこれらの言語が存在することは、その地域の支配的な言語としばしば並行しながら、言語がどのように進化し、使用される文脈に適応してきたかを示すさらなる証拠である。

言語とナショナル・アイデンティティ：政治と文化のはざまで

人口移動と宗教は、世界の他の地域と同様、中東における言語の普及と進化において強力なベクトルとなってきた。歴史的に見ても、言語の拡散には移動が重要な役割を果たしてきた。例えば、7世紀にイスラム教の拡大によってアラブ人が侵入し、アラビア語が中東と北アフリカに広まった。この拡大はアラビア語を広めただけでなく、現地の言語を統合し、影響を及ぼし、多数の異なるアラビア語の方言を生み出した。同様に、テュルク系帝国、特にオスマン帝国の拡大は、テュルク系言語を拡大し、オスマン・トルコ語（ペルシア語とアラビア語の影響を受けたトルコ語の一種）を中東、バルカン半島、北アフリカ全域の行政・文学言語として確立させた。宗教もまた、言語の採用と標準化を促進した。コーランの言語であるアラビア語は、世界中のイスラム教徒間の言語的なつながりとなり、従来のアラビア語圏の国境を越えて使用されるようになった。同様に、ユダヤ教やキリスト教の宗教文書は、ヘブライ語やアラム語が日常的に話されなくなっても、その保存に役立った。中東の言語は固定的なものではなく、民族間の絶え間ない交流、信仰、歴史の結果である。交易、征服、植民地化、そして改宗によって言語は広まり、今日のような複雑な言語景観を形成してきた。

現代の中東における国民国家の形成は、言語慣行に大きな影響を与えた。国家は、1つ以上の公用語を設けることで、統一された国民的アイデンティティを促進し、国境内でのコミュニケーションや行政を円滑に行おうとすることが多かった。このような言語政策はナショナリズムの高揚につながり、公用語は国民統合の象徴となり、集団的アイデンティティの重要な要素となる。例えば、オスマン帝国が崩壊し、1923年にトルコ共和国が誕生した後、トルコでは標準トルコ語の普及が推進されたが、これは国内の多様な住民を単一のトルコ民族のアイデンティティの下に統一することを目的としていた。同様に、アラビア語圏における現代標準アラビア語の採用は、しばしば汎アラブ民族主義運動と結びつけられてきた。しかし、標準化や国語の普及は、地域言語や少数派の言語や方言を疎外するなど、意図しない結果をもたらすこともある。その結果、一般市民による使用が減少し、長期的な存続可能性が損なわれたり、消滅したりすることさえある。たとえば、クルド人の少数言語や方言の多くは、文化的同化を達成するために、さまざまな国で弾圧されてきた。

逆説的ではあるが、特定の言語の禁止や弾圧は、しばしばコミュニティの文化的アイデンティティの重要な要素とみなされるこれらの言語や方言への関心を再び高めることにもつながる。場合によっては、それが言語的・文化的抗議運動につながることもある。例えば、トルコでは長年にわたってアルメニア語の公用語が弾圧されてきたが、その結果、世界中のアルメニア人コミュニティの間で、アルメニア語に対する認識と評価が高まっている。結局のところ、中東における言語政策は、ナショナル・アイデンティティの構築と文化的・言語的多様性の維持との間の緊張関係を反映している。こうした政策に対する反応は多様であり、国語を熱心に採用するものから、文化保存や政治的抵抗の行為として伝統的な言語を抵抗・維持するものまで、さまざまである。

宗教パノラマ

中東は、アナトリア（現代のトルコのアジア部分）、エジプト（地理的には北アフリカに位置するが、文化的・歴史的に中東とつながっている）、メソポタミア（現代のイラクとシリア、イランとトルコの一部に相当）などの地域を含む広い意味で定義されることが多い。文化と歴史の多様性に富むこの地域は、世界の主要な宗教の発祥地として知られている。

最初の一神教のひとつであるユダヤ教は、レバント、特に現在イスラエルとパレスチナ自治区に分かれているカナンの歴史的地域で生まれた。そのルーツは3000年以上前にさかのぼり、ユダヤ教はこの地域の宗教的・文化的発展において中心的な役割を果たしてきた。紀元1世紀にユダヤ教から発展したキリスト教も、その起源は中東、特に歴史的なユダヤ教地域にある。キリスト教はローマ帝国内外に急速に広まり、主要な世界宗教となった。三大アブラハム宗教の中で最も新しいイスラム教は、7世紀初頭にアラビアの都市メッカで預言者モハメッドに啓示された。イスラム教はアラビア半島に急速に広まり、征服と交易を通じてアジア、アフリカ、ヨーロッパの広大な地域に広がった。これらのアブラハム宗教に加え、中東はゾロアスター教発祥の地でもある。ゾロアスター教は、古代ペルシャ（現在のイラン）で預言者ツァラトゥストラ（またはゾロアスター）によって創始された。ゾロアスター教はイスラム化以前のペルシャで支配的な宗教のひとつであり、しばしば最古の一神教のひとつとみなされ、善と悪の闘争という二元論的な概念を通じて他の宗教伝統に影響を与えてきた。

これらの宗教はそれぞれ、この地域の豊かな文化と歴史のタペストリーに貢献し、現代の中東の生活、文化、政治に深い影響を与え続けている。宗教の多様性と歴史の深さにより、中東は世界中の学者、信者、観光客にとって特に重要な場所となっている。

ユダヤ教の基礎と進化=

初期ユダヤ教と一神教

ユダヤ教は歴史上最初の一神教の一つとして認識されている。今日のイスラエルとその周辺地域に相当するレバント地方で生まれたユダヤ教は、人類の宗教的・文化的発展において重要な役割を果たしてきた。ユダヤ教の起源は紀元前2000年頃まで遡り、聖書に登場するアブラハム、イサク、ヤコブはこの宗教の家長と考えられている。ユダヤ教は、唯一の神であるYHWH（ヤハウェ）と、タナフ（ヘブライ語聖書）として知られる聖典の一部であるトーラー（律法）に表された一連の法則と倫理原則を信じることを中心としている。ユダヤ教が当時の他の宗教的伝統と異なるのは、厳格な一神教であることだ。多くの古代文化が多神教を信奉していたのに対し、ユダヤ教は宇宙の創造主であり人類の道徳的指導者である唯一神の存在を肯定していた。

宗教的な側面に加えて、ユダヤ教は民族的・文化的な側面も強く持っている。ユダヤ人は自分たちを信仰の信者としてだけでなく、共通の歴史と伝統によって結ばれた民族や国家の一員であるとも考えている。何世紀にもわたって、ユダヤ教は他の多くの宗教の信仰や実践に大きな影響を与えてきました。特にキリスト教やイスラム教はユダヤ教と一定のルーツを共有しており、ユダヤ教の聖書の人物の多くを預言者や重要な教師として認めています。

アブラハムとユダヤ教の家父長系

一神教の父とされるアブラハムは、ユダヤ教、キリスト教、イスラム教の中心人物である。ユダヤ教の伝統によれば、アブラハムはギリシャのエデッサではなく、メソポタミアのウルで生まれた。エデッサはウルファとして知られるトルコの歴史的な都市だが、聖書の記述ではアブラハムの物語とは関係がない。聖書の記述では、神の命によりメソポタミアからカナンに向かったアブラハムの旅が描かれており、神はアブラハムの子孫を偉大な国にすると約束した。アブラハムと妻サラ、そして彼女の奴隷ハガルとの複雑な関係は、この物語の重要な要素である。子供ができなかったサラは、ハガルをアブラハムに渡し、そこからイシュマエルが生まれる。サラは後にイサクを産んだ。ユダヤ教の伝統では、イサクは約束の子であり、ユダヤ人は自分たちがその子孫であると考えている。イスラム教の伝統では、イシュマエルが約束の子とみなされることが多いが、イスラム教もイサクの重要性を認めている。イサクの息子ヤコブも重要な人物である。伝承によれば、ヤコブには12人の息子がおり、その子孫がイスラエルの12部族となり、ヘブライ民族の形成につながった。

エジプトの出エジプトとシナイ山での啓示

エジプトでの奴隷の話は、ユダヤ人の歴史のもう一つの基本的な部分である。ヘブライ人はエジプトで生活した後、奴隷となり、数世紀後、ユダヤ教の伝統におけるもう一人の中心人物であるモーセの指導の下に解放された。出エジプトとして知られるこのエジプトからの脱出は、ユダヤの歴史における重要な出来事であり、毎年ペサハ（過越祭）で祝われる。これらの物語は宗教的な物語であるだけでなく、ユダヤ人の文化的、歴史的アイデンティティを形成してきた。これらの物語は、ユダヤ民族とその土地、そして信仰との間の現在進行形の関係を強調しており、この関係はユダヤの文化と歴史を理解する上で中心的な位置を占めている。

モーセの人物像とシナイ山での啓示の出来事は、ユダヤ教の伝統の中で最も重要なものの一つであり、ユダヤ民族の歴史とアイデンティティにおいて深い重要性を持っている。聖書の記述によれば、エジプトのファラオの家で育ったヘブライ人のモーセは、イスラエルの民を奴隷から解放するために神に選ばれる。エジプトの十の災いを含む一連の奇跡的な出来事の後、モーセはイスラエルの民をエジプトから導き出す。出エジプトは、ユダヤ民族の物理的な解放だけでなく、神のもとでの統一国家としての出現を象徴している。

彼らの旅で最も重要な瞬間は、シナイ山での啓示であり、伝統によれば、そこで神（ヤハウェ）はモーセに十戒を含む律法を授ける。この瞬間は、神とイスラエルの民との間の基本的な契約とみなされ、彼らの精神的・社会的生活を導く一連の掟と指示を受ける。ユダヤ教の中心である律法には、掟や教えだけでなく、世界創世以来のユダヤ民族の歴史も含まれている。特に十戒は、ユダヤ教のみならず、キリスト教、そして間接的にはイスラム教の基本的な道徳的・倫理的原則を定めている点で重要である。ユダヤ教とキリスト教の伝統における法と倫理の礎石と考えられている。ユダヤ教におけるこれらの出来事の重要性を過小評価することはできない。ユダヤ教の信仰の中心であるだけでなく、ユダヤ人の価値観、習慣、アイデンティティを形成してきた。ペサハの出エジプトの記念やシャブオットの律法受領は、これらの歴史的出来事がユダヤ教の祭りと祝典の年間サイクルに組み込まれている例であり、ユダヤの民に自分たちの歴史と神への約束を常に思い起こさせている。

カナンの征服と預言者の時代

エジプトからの脱出と砂漠の旅の後、ヨシュアに率いられたイスラエルの民は、聖書によれば、神が彼らの先祖に約束したカナンの地に入った。聖書のテキストに記されたこの過程では、イスラエル人がこの地に存在することを確立するために、一連の戦いと征服が行われた。しかし、聖書に記述されているこれらの出来事の歴史的正確性については、歴史学者や考古学者の間でも議論があることに注意する必要がある。

紀元前10世紀に君臨したダビデ王は、ユダヤ民族の歴史の中心人物である。伝承によれば、彼はイスラエルの諸部族を統一し、エルサレムを征服して王国の首都とした。エルサレムは、政治的な中心地としてだけでなく、精神的な中心地としても、ユダヤ教の伝統の中で中心的な重要性を獲得した。息子のソロモン王は、エルサレムに第一神殿を建てたことで有名である。この神殿はユダヤ教の礼拝の中心となり、シナイ山でモーセに授けられた律法の板（十戒）を納めた契約の箱が置かれることになっていた。ソロモン神殿は、イスラエル王国の主権と統一の象徴であるだけでなく、ユダヤ人にとって宗教的に大きな意味を持つ場所でもある。

イスラエル王国とユダ王国の時代は、ユダヤ教の伝統において重要な人物である預言者たちの活動によっても特徴づけられた。イザヤ、エレミヤ、エゼキエルといった預言者たちは、王に助言を与え、社会的・道徳的不正を批判し、人々に神の戒めを思い起こさせるという重要な役割を果たした。彼らのメッセージと著作は聖書のテキストの重要な部分を形成し、ユダヤ人の宗教思想に影響を与え続けている。この時代は、ユダヤ人のアイデンティティと信仰を形成する上で基本的なものであった。エルサレムをユダヤ教の精神的中心地として確立し、現代のユダヤ教の中心となっている多くの習慣や信仰の基礎を築いた。

ソロモンの死後、紀元前926年頃、統一イスラエル王国は、サマリアを首都とするイスラエルと呼ばれる北王国と、エルサレムを首都とするユダと呼ばれる南王国に分裂した。この分裂は、政治的、経済的な緊張だけでなく、2つの王国の間の宗教的、文化的な違いも反映していた。北王国であるイスラエルの方が領土も人口も多かったが、地理的な位置から外部からの影響や侵略を受けやすかった。

紀元前722年、当時強大な帝国であったアッシリアがサマリアに侵入し、征服したとき、北王国はついに壊滅的な敗北を喫した。この出来事によってイスラエル王国は終わりを告げ、人口の大部分は国外に追放され離散した。この追放と離散は、政治的・軍事的な面だけでなく、文化的・宗教的アイデンティティの面でも深刻な影響を及ぼした。南の王国ユダはこの時代を生き延びたが、新バビロニア帝国を含むさまざまな帝国の臣下となった。しかし、ユダも最終的には滅亡し、紀元前586年にバビロニアによってエルサレムが征服され、第一神殿が破壊された。これらの出来事はユダヤの歴史において重要である。政治的、軍事的な転換点であるだけでなく、文化的、宗教的変容の決定的瞬間でもある。征服、追放、帰還の経験は、ユダヤ人の思想と文学に大きな影響を及ぼし、特に多くの聖書が書かれ、律法と宗教的共同体を中心にユダヤ人のアイデンティティと信仰が強化された。

王国の滅亡とディアスポラの夜明け

紀元前722年のアッシリアによるイスラエル王国の滅亡は、イスラエル民族にとって最初の大災害（ヘブライ語で「チャーバン」）となった。この侵略は北王国の10部族の離散につながり、この出来事はしばしば「失われたイスラエルの10部族」という文脈で言及される。この離散は、ユダヤ人の集団的アイデンティティと歴史的記憶に大きな影響を与えた。このような苦難や亡命生活、外国からの支配下での試練に対して、ユダヤ教のラビや学者たちはユダヤ教の伝統を守り、解釈する上で不可欠な役割を果たした。しかし、ユダヤ人の口承律法の主要な集大成である『ミシュナ』は、イスラエル王国とユダ王国の時代よりずっと後、紀元後2世紀末に書かれたものであることに注意する必要がある。ミシュナとゲマラ（ミシュナの注釈書）を合わせたものがタルムードであり、ラビ・ユダヤ教における中心的なテキストである。

タナフは、トーラー（モーセの五書）、ネヴィーム（預言者）、ケトゥヴィム（詩篇を含む著作）から成る。エリヤ、イザヤ、エレミヤのような預言者たちは、それぞれの時代に生き、イスラエル人の宗教的・社会的生活において重要な役割を果たし、改革、社会正義、神への忠誠のメッセージを送った。これらの預言者たちは、しばしば危機と変化の時代に行動し、その教えと行動はユダヤ民族が直面する課題を反映していた。ネヴィーム書の一部をなす彼らの著作は、ユダヤ教、ユダヤ人の精神性、ユダヤ民族の歴史を理解する上で基本的なものである。これらのテキストは、ユダヤ人のアイデンティティを維持する上で重要な役割を果たし、特に迫害や離散の時期には、力とインスピレーションの源となってきた。

紀元前587年、新バビロニア帝国の王ネブカドネザル2世によってエルサレムの第一神殿が破壊されたことは、ユダヤ民族にとって大きな惨事であった。この破壊は、ユダヤ人の大部分がメソポタミアに追放されることを伴い、ユダヤ人の集団意識に深く刻み込まれた壊滅的な出来事であった。バビロン追放は、領土的、政治的損失だけでなく、深い精神的、アイデンティティ的危機を象徴し、ユダヤ人は神との関係、歴史、民族としてのアイデンティティを再考することを余儀なくされた。ユダヤ人のユダヤへの帰還は、紀元前539年にバビロンを征服したペルシャ帝国の王、キュロス大王の台頭によって始まった。キュロスは、ユダヤ人を含む離散した民族の寛容と回復の政策で知られている。聖書のエズラ記によると、キュロスはユダヤ人のユダヤへの帰還とエルサレム神殿の再建を認める勅令を出した。この帰還は紀元前538年頃に始まり、ユダヤ人社会の再生の瞬間となった。

第二神殿は再建されたが、建設が始まったのはヘロデ大王の時代ではなかった。神殿再建のプロセスはもっと早く、紀元前516年頃に始まり、聖書に預言されていた70年間の流浪の期間が完成した。第二神殿は、紀元70年にローマ軍によって破壊されるまで、ユダヤ人にとって宗教的・地域的な中心であり続けた。そのずっと後（紀元前37-4年）に君臨したヘロデ大王は、第二神殿の大規模な改修と拡張を行い、さらに壮麗で豪華なものにしたことが知られている。ヘロデによって拡大・装飾されたこの神殿は、イエスの時代に存在したものであり、新約聖書でもしばしば言及されている。

神殿以後のユダヤ教とユダヤ人社会の発展

紀元前1世紀のローマ征服後、パレスチナはローマの支配下に入った。紀元前332年、マケドニアのアレクサンダー大王がこの地域を征服し、ヘレニズム時代の幕開けとなった。アレクサンダーの死後、この地域はさまざまなヘレニズム王朝、特にエジプトのプトレマイオス朝やシリアのセレウコス朝の支配下に入った。ユダヤがローマ帝国のクライアント王国となったのは紀元前1世紀になってからである。ローマ帝国の支配下、ユダヤ人は宗教的・文化的緊張と重税によって悪化した弾圧の時代を経験した。紀元70年、後の皇帝ティトゥスの指揮の下、ローマ帝国がエルサレムの第二神殿を破壊したことは、ユダヤ人にとって壊滅的な出来事だった。この破壊は、ローマ帝国の支配に対するユダヤ人の大反乱に続くものであった。ユダヤ教の精神的・国家的中心であった神殿の喪失は、ユダヤ人の宗教的アイデンティティと実践に深刻な影響を及ぼした。神殿の破壊後、ユダヤ人の離散（または「ディアスポラ」）は加速した。神殿が破壊される以前から、古代世界各地にユダヤ人社会は分散していたが（エジプト、バビロニア、ギリシャ、イタリアなど）、この出来事は、より広範で組織的な分散の時代の幕開けとなった。多くのユダヤ人がユダヤから逃れ、あるいは追放され、ローマ帝国内外のさまざまな地域に定住した。この離散はユダヤ教に永続的な影響を与えた。礼拝の中心としての神殿を失ったユダヤ教は、祈り、聖典の研究、シナゴーグでの宗教的実践を重視するようになり、発展した。ユダヤ人のディアスポラはユダヤ人のアイデンティティの中心的な要素となり、地理的な分散にもかかわらず、信仰と歴史によって結ばれた民族という概念が生まれた。

ヘブライ人」から「ユダヤ人」へのアイデンティティの変遷は、ユダヤ人の歴史の重要な側面であり、領土の喪失や政治的変化など多くの要因と関連している。ヘブライ人」（ヘブライ語ではイヴリム）という言葉は、もともとヘブライ語聖書の中で、特に他の民族との関係において、イスラエル人の祖先を指す言葉として使われていた。この用語は、ユダヤ人の歴史の初期、特に家父長（アブラハム、イサク、ヤコブ）の時代とエジプトからの出エジプトに関連していることが多い。一方、「ユダヤ人」（ヘブライ語でイェフーディム）という言葉は、ヤコブの十二人の息子の一人であり、イスラエル十二部族の一人である「ユダ」（イェフーダ）に由来する。統一王国がイスラエル王国（北）とユダ王国（南）に分裂し、イスラエル王国がアッシリアに滅ぼされた後、ユダ王国がイスラエル人のアイデンティティの中心となった。バビロニアが第一神殿を破壊し、ユダの人口の大部分を追放したとき、これらの人々は「イェフディム」または「ユダヤ人」と呼ばれた。

紀元70年にローマ帝国が第二神殿を破壊し、その後ユダヤ人が離散すると、ユダヤ人のアイデンティティは、特定の領土や政治的主権よりも、むしろ宗教と文化にさらに重点を置くようになった。こうして、"ユダヤ人 "という言葉は、単なる民族的・国家的なものでなく、宗教的・文化的な所属と同義になった。領土の喪失と政治的変化がこの進化に一役買ったことは間違いないが、「ヘブライ人」から「ユダヤ人」への移行は、人々の理解と自己同一性における内的な進化をも反映している。このように、「ユダヤ人」という言葉は、地理的・政治的境界を越えて、宗教的・文化的・民族的アイデンティティを包含している。

世界のユダヤ言語とユダヤ文化

アシュケナージ・ユダヤ人はもともと中欧と東欧出身で、独自の言語と文化を発展させた。彼らの言語であるイディッシュ語は、この独特な文化の顕著な例である。イディッシュ語は、ヘブライ語やスラブ語の要素を取り入れたゲルマン語であり、アシュケナージ・ユダヤ人の歴史と経験を反映している。この言語は日常的なコミュニケーションの道具であっただけでなく、アシュケナージ・ユダヤ人の文学、演劇、詩の重要な手段でもあった。一方、主にイベリア半島（スペインとポルトガル）出身のセファルディ系ユダヤ人は、ラディーノ語またはユダヤ系スペイン語として知られる別の混成言語を発達させた。ラディーノ語はイディッシュ語と同様、スペイン語にヘブライ語やトルコ語、アラビア語などの他の言語を混ぜ合わせたもので、1492年にスペインから追放された後のセファルディ系ユダヤ人の移住や交流を反映している。

宗教的実践という点では、ユダヤ教は多様である。正統派はユダヤ教の掟や伝統を厳格に守り、改革派や自由主義（進歩派や穏健派とも呼ばれる）はより柔軟な解釈や実践を採用する傾向がある。また、伝統の遵守と現代の現実への適応のバランスを追求する保守主義や再建主義の運動もある。このような多様性は、ユダヤ教がそのアイデンティティと基本的価値を守りながら進化し、適応していく能力を反映している。アシュケナージ系、セファルディ系、その他の出自を問わず、世界中のさまざまなユダヤ人社会が、ユダヤ文化と伝統の豊かなタペストリーに貢献しており、それぞれが独自の視点と経験をもたらしている。

The Origins and Branches of Christianity

The expansion of Christianity in the Roman Empire

Christianity is centred on the figure of Jesus of Nazareth, whom Christians recognise as the Messiah (the Christ) and the Son of God. His birth, life, teaching, death and resurrection are at the heart of the Christian faith.

According to the New Testament, Jesus was born in Bethlehem, a small town in Judea. The accounts of his birth are recounted in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke, which mention the virgin birth of Mary, his mother, and the announcement of his birth by angels as an event of great importance. Jesus spent most of his life in the region of Galilee, preaching a message of love, compassion and repentance, calling for spiritual renewal and a personal relationship with God. He gathered a group of disciples around him and performed various miracles, according to the Gospel accounts.

His crucifixion in Jerusalem is a central moment in Christianity. Christians believe that through his death, Jesus offered the ultimate sacrifice for the forgiveness of humanity's sins, and that his resurrection three days later offers the promise of salvation and eternal life. This event is commemorated every year at the Christian Easter. Christianity began as a movement within Judaism in the 1st century, but quickly spread to other, mainly non-Jewish, populations throughout the Roman Empire and beyond. The figure of Jesus and his teachings have had a profound influence on human history, shaping not only the Christian religion but also many aspects of Western and world civilisation.

Legalisation and institutionalisation of Christianity

Under Emperor Constantine I, with the Edict of Milan in 313 AD, Christianity was legalised in the Roman Empire, putting an end to official persecution. Later, under Emperor Theodosius I in 380 AD, Christianity became the official religion of the Roman Empire with the Edict of Thessalonica. This imperial recognition profoundly transformed Christianity, allowing it to spread and influence all aspects of Roman society. However, this integration of Christianity into imperial power structures also created tensions and divergences within the Christian community. Some Christian communities sought to distance themselves from the official Church and the Empire, either because of theological differences or in response to what they perceived as the corruption or politicisation of their faith. These groups, often labelled sects or heresies by the official Church, sought to preserve a form of Christianity that they considered more authentic or faithful to the original teachings of Jesus and the apostles.

Such differences led to various schisms and movements within Christianity, some of which persisted for centuries. These divisions were exacerbated by theological debates (such as the nature of the Trinity or the relationship between the divinity and humanity of Jesus), cultural and linguistic differences, and political conflicts within the Empire. The integration of Christianity into the structure of the Roman Empire therefore had a complex impact: it enabled an unprecedented expansion and institutionalisation of the religion, but also sowed the seeds of internal divisions that would continue to shape the history of Christianity in the centuries that followed.

The debate over the nature of Jesus is one of the greatest and most significant in the history of Christianity. This theological question, which concerns the relationship between the divinity and humanity of Jesus, was at the heart of many controversies and led to several major councils in the early Church. The main question was how Jesus could be both fully divine and fully human. This issue was first significantly addressed at the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD, where the doctrine of the Trinity began to take shape. The Nicene Creed, resulting from this Council, affirmed that Jesus was "of the same substance" (homoousios) as the Father, thus establishing his full divinity. However, this declaration did not put an end to the debate. Over the following centuries, different schools of thought emerged. Two of the most influential were Arianism, which held that Jesus, although divine, was not of the same substance as the Father, and was therefore inferior to him; and Nestorianism, which taught that the divine and human natures of Jesus were separate and distinct.

These debates reached their climax at the Council of Chalcedon in 451 AD, which resulted in the formulation of the so-called "double nature" of Christ: Jesus was recognised as being both fully divine and fully human, the two natures being united in one person without being mixed, confused or separated. This doctrine is known as Chalcedonian Christology. This debate about the nature of Jesus was not just an abstract theological question; it had major political, social and cultural repercussions in the Roman Empire and beyond. Disagreements over these issues led to schisms within the Church and were even the cause of conflict and persecution. The way in which the various Christian communities responded to these issues significantly shaped the evolution of Christianity in the centuries that followed.

The Council of Nicaea and the Formation of Christian Doctrine

The Council of Nicaea, held in 325 AD, was a crucial moment in the history of Christianity for several reasons. It was the first ecumenical council, bringing together bishops from all over the Roman Empire to debate and decide on central theological issues. The main issue at stake was to respond to Arianism, a doctrine promoted by Arius, a priest from Alexandria, who maintained that Jesus was not of the same substance as God the Father, but was rather a creature created by God and inferior to him. The Council of Nicaea rejected Arianism and affirmed that Jesus was "consubstantial" (of the same substance) with the Father, thus affirming his full divinity. This decision was codified in the Nicene Creed, which became a fundamental statement of the Christian faith.

However, the Nicene decision did not resolve all the controversies. It led to the formation of different interpretations and churches, particularly between the Church of the East and the Church of the West. These differences were linked not only to theological issues, but also to linguistic, cultural and political ones. The Jacobites, for example, followed the teachings of James Baradai and were associated with the Syriac Orthodox Church. They rejected the decisions of the Council of Chalcedon (451 AD), which had elaborated further on the nature of Christ by affirming that he had two natures, divine and human, united in one person. The Jacobites and other groups, such as the Nestorians and Monophysites, formed their own distinct ecclesiastical communities, often in opposition to the doctrines established by the dominant imperial and ecclesiastical authorities.

These divisions and controversies within Christianity significantly shaped the evolution of the religion, leading to a complex mosaic of Christian traditions around the world. These different communities have maintained their own theological interpretations, liturgical practices and organisational structures, contributing to the rich and sometimes conflicting diversity of Christianity over the centuries.

The Council of Chalcedon and Dyophysite Christology

The Council of Chalcedon, held in 451 AD, is a major event in the history of Christianity, as it tackled head-on the complex question of the nature of Christ. This Council is often regarded as the culmination of the Christological debates that ran through the Christian Church for several centuries. The decision of the Council of Chalcedon established that Jesus Christ possesses two distinct natures - divine and human - united in a single person (hypostasis). This formulation is known as "Dyophysite Christology". According to this doctrine, the two natures of Christ coexist without confusion, without change, without division and without separation. This meant that, although Christ is fully God and fully man, his two natures do not mix, thus preserving both his complete divinity and his complete humanity.

This Council was crucial in establishing an orthodoxy accepted by the majority of Christians, but it also led to significant divisions. Several Churches, notably some Eastern Churches, rejected the decisions of Chalcedon. These churches are often called "non-Chalcedonian" or "pre-Chalcedonian" and include the Coptic Church in Egypt, the Ethiopian Orthodox Church, the Armenian Apostolic Church and others. These communities maintained their own understanding of the nature of Christ, often focusing on the unity of his divine and human natures. The Council of Chalcedon thus marks a pivotal moment in the history of Christianity, establishing a fundamental doctrine for many Christian churches, while at the same time creating lasting schisms with other communities that did not accept its conclusions. These Christological divisions remain an important facet of the differences between the various Christian traditions to this day.

• 

  Emperor Constantine (centre), with the bishops of the Council of Nicaea (325), anachronistically holding the text of the "Nicaea-Constantinople symbol" in its Greek liturgical form, based on the text adopted at the first Council of Constantinople (381).

• 

  The separation of the Eastern (blue) and Western (orange) Churches from 1054.

Political and Cultural Implications of Theological Divergences

The Great Schism of 1054, marking the separation between the Church of the East, later known as the Orthodox Church, and the Church of the West, the Roman Catholic Church, represented a historic turning point in Christianity. This rupture was not an isolated event, but rather the culmination of a long period of growing divergence between the two branches of Christianity. At the heart of these differences were profound theological and ecclesiastical disputes. One major point of contention concerned the question of papal authority. The Church of Rome, with figures such as Pope Leo IX, claimed supreme authority over all the Christian churches, a position contested by the Church of the East. The Patriarchate of Constantinople, under leaders such as Michael Cerularus, rejected the idea of centralised authority and advocated a more collegial approach.

Another key point of contention was the addition of the "Filioque" to the Nicene Creed by the Church of the West. This change, stating that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father "and from the Son", was seen by the Church of the East as an unacceptable alteration of a doctrine established at the first ecumenical councils. This debate reflected wider differences in understanding of the Trinity and the nature of God. Beyond theological issues, cultural and political differences also played a role. The collapse of the Western Roman Empire and the rise of the Byzantine Empire had created a gulf between the two regions. Linguistic differences, with Latin predominating in the West and Greek in the East, also contributed to a growing cultural divide.

The symbolic event that marked the culmination of these tensions was the mutual excommunication of 1054. Legates sent by Pope Leo IX to Constantinople excommunicated Patriarch Michael Cerularus, who responded by excommunicating the legates. Although this excommunication was the most dramatic gesture, it represented the culmination of a long series of disagreements and misunderstandings. The Great Schism had profound repercussions on the subsequent development of Christianity, solidifying the division between the Roman Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church. This division, rooted in theological, cultural and political differences, has shaped not only religious history but also the political and cultural trajectories of Europe and the surrounding regions. Efforts have been made in modern times towards dialogue and reconciliation, but the divisions of the Schism of 1054 continue to influence the world's religious and cultural landscape.

Protestantism and the Reformation: Transforming Christianity

In the 16th century, Christianity was profoundly transformed by the emergence of Protestantism, a movement that challenged the doctrines and practices of the Roman Catholic Church and led to the Protestant Reformation. This period marked a crucial turning point in Europe's religious history and had lasting global repercussions. The genesis of Protestantism is often attributed to Martin Luther, a German monk and theologian. In 1517, Luther posted his "95 Theses" on the door of the church in Wittenberg, criticising various aspects of the Catholic Church, including the sale of indulgences. His writings circulated rapidly, fuelled by the recent invention of the printing press, and resonated with a public increasingly dissatisfied with certain Church practices.

Luther challenged key doctrines of the Catholic Church, such as the authority of the Pope and the efficacy of works for salvation, advocating instead justification by faith alone ('sola fide') and the authority of Scripture alone ('sola scriptura'). These ideas challenged the foundations of the Catholic Church and initiated a series of religious reforms across Europe. Other key figures in the Protestant Reformation included Jean Calvin in Geneva, who developed a theological system known as Calvinism, and Huldrych Zwingli in Zurich. Each of these reformers helped shape various strands of Protestantism, which then spawned a multitude of denominations, including Lutherans, Reformed, Presbyterians and Anabaptists, among others.

The Reformation brought about profound changes not only in the religious sphere, but also in the political, cultural and social spheres. It led to religious wars throughout Europe, changes in political power structures, and had an influence on education, literature and the arts. The Protestant Reformation also paved the way for the expansion of Christianity around the world, particularly through missionary activities in the European colonies. Thus, the 16th century was a period of major transformation for Christianity, with Protestantism challenging the established structures of the Church and redefining the way in which many Christians understood their faith and practised their religion.

Throughout the complex history of Christianity, there have been times when some Eastern Churches have established links with the Roman Catholic Church, leading to Christian communities that combine elements of Eastern and Western traditions. These Churches, often called Eastern Catholic Churches or Uniate Churches, have retained their liturgical rites and Eastern cultural heritage while accepting the authority of the Pope and certain Roman Catholic doctrines. This movement towards union with Rome has been motivated by various factors, including political considerations, desires for support in the face of external pressure, and theological and ecclesiastical interests. A notable example is the Union of Brest in 1596, when certain bishops of the Orthodox Church in Poland-Lithuania agreed to union with the Roman Catholic Church, forming the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church. Similarly, the Maronite Catholic Church in Lebanon has long maintained communion with Rome while preserving its Eastern liturgical and spiritual traditions.

As far as Christian demographics over the centuries are concerned, it is true that in some regions, particularly in the Middle East and North Africa, the proportion of Christians to the total population has declined over time. This decline can be attributed to various factors, such as conversions, migrations, political changes, and social and economic pressures. For example, after the Muslim conquest of the Middle East, many Christians gradually adopted the Islamic language and religion, although Christian communities continued to exist in the region. However, on a global scale, Christianity expanded significantly, largely as a result of missionary movements and European colonisation between the 16th and 20th centuries. Today, Christianity remains one of the world's major religions, with a substantial presence on every continent. It is important to note that, despite the challenges and changes, Christian communities have continued to preserve their faith and traditions, often in very diverse cultural and political contexts. Christianity's ability to adapt and transform while preserving its core beliefs is a notable aspect of its history.

Principles and currents of Islam

Muhammad: Prophet and Foundation of Islam

Islam centres on the figure of Muhammad, considered by Muslims to be the last prophet sent by God to guide humanity. Muhammad's life and teachings play a fundamental role in Islam and have profoundly influenced the development of this religion. Born in Mecca in 570 AD, Muhammad grew up in a context where the Arabian Peninsula was dominated by polytheistic practices and a tribal social system. His youth was marked by orphanhood and poverty, but he later acquired a reputation for trust and integrity in his work as a merchant. These experiences gave him a unique perspective on the various social, economic and religious aspects of his society. According to Islamic tradition, at the age of 40 Muhammad began to receive revelations from God (Allah in Arabic) through the angel Gabriel. These revelations, which continued for 23 years, formed the Koran, the sacred text of Islam.

Muhammad's message emphasised strict monotheism (Tawhid), social justice, moral responsibility and equality before God. Aware of the inequalities and injustices of Meccan society, his teachings called for a radical change in the social and religious structures of the time. However, his preaching met with strong opposition from Meccan leaders, mainly because of the economic and social implications of his message, which challenged the power structures and religious practices established in Mecca. These tensions eventually led to the Hegira (migration) of Muhammad and his first followers from Mecca to Medina in 622 AD, an event so significant that it marked the beginning of the Islamic calendar.

The Hegira: A turning point in Islamic history

In Medina, Muhammad established a community (Ummah) based on Islamic principles, where he played a role of spiritual, political and military leader. The following years saw the rapid expansion of Islam across the Arabian Peninsula, as well as the consolidation of the various Arab tribes under the banner of the new faith. After Muhammad's death in 632 AD, his teachings and example continued to guide Muslims. Islam spread rapidly beyond the Arabian Peninsula, becoming a major religious, cultural and political force in the world. Muhammad's life and teachings remain at the heart of the Muslim faith, profoundly influencing the beliefs, practices and culture of Muslims around the world.

The period following Muhammad's death in 632 AD is crucial in the history of Islam, as it laid the foundations for its political structure and internal divisions. The Hegira, Muhammad's migration from Mecca to Medina in 622, was a founding moment in Islam, marking the beginning of the Islamic calendar and the establishment of a united Muslim community under his leadership.

When Muhammad died in 632, he did not explicitly name a successor to lead him, which led to a crucial question: who should lead the Muslim community (Ummah)? This question gave rise to the two main branches of Islam: Sunnism and Shiism. The Sunnis, who represent the majority of Muslims, believe that Muhammad's successor should be elected from among the members of the Muslim community and follow the "Sunna" (tradition based on Muhammad's teachings and practices). The first caliph elected according to this tradition was Abu Bakr, a close companion and father-in-law of Muhammad. Shiites, on the other hand, believe that the leadership of the Muslim community should remain within Muhammad's family. They maintain that Ali, Muhammad's cousin and son-in-law, was his designated successor. Shiites use the term "Ahl al-Bayt" (people of the house) to refer to Muhammad's family and their descendants.

The period from 632 to 661 AD, known as the period of the 'Rightly Guided Caliphs' or 'Rashidun', saw Abu Bakr's successors, 'Umar and 'Uthman, become Caliphs. Each of these caliphs was elected by consensus or by council from among Muhammad's companions. However, tensions and disagreements over the question of succession led to divisions and conflicts, culminating in the Fitna, a series of civil wars that deeply affected the Muslim community. This period laid the foundations for the caliphate, the political structure of the Muslim empire, which was to develop and change form over the centuries. The initial divisions between Sunnis and Shiites, although mainly theological and political at the outset, significantly shaped the history, politics and culture of the Muslim world.

The Battle of Nehavend and the Fall of the Sassanid Empire

The Battle of Nehavend, which took place around 641-642 AD, is a major historical milestone in the expansion of Islam and the fall of the Sassanid Empire. This military confrontation, which took place in what is now north-west Iran, pitted rising Muslim Arab forces against the army of the Sassanid Empire, a once powerful empire weakened by prolonged conflict and internal unrest. Prior to this battle, the Sassanid Empire, under the reign of Yazdgard III, had already suffered heavy losses in the face of Muslim conquests. The Battle of Nehavend is often seen as the final blow to Sassanid resistance. The Muslim victory in this battle was decisive: not only did it mark the end of organised resistance by the Sassanid Empire, but it also paved the way for the rapid expansion of Islam in the region. This victory, dubbed by Muslims "the victory of victories", had profound consequences for the course of regional history. With the defeat of the Sassanid army, Yazdgard III was forced to flee eastwards, desperately seeking allies to reconquer his empire. However, his efforts proved fruitless, and the Sassanid Empire, once a rival of the Byzantine Empire, disappeared from history.

The impact of this battle goes far beyond the battlefield. It marked the beginning of a major cultural and religious transformation in Persia. With the Muslim conquest, the region began a gradual conversion from the Zoroastrian religion to Islam. This transition was not limited to religious aspects; it also brought about major linguistic and cultural changes. Arabic became the main language of administration and scholarly culture, although Persian language and culture continued to play a significant role in the region. The Battle of Nehavend therefore illustrates how military conquest can have lasting implications for the cultural and religious identity of a region. By transforming the Persia of the Sassanid Empire into a key territory of the Islamic world, this battle not only redrawn the political map of the region, but also laid the foundations for the cultural and religious developments that followed.

The Shiites and their Vision of Islamic Leadership

The Shiites, whose name literally means "followers of Ali", hold that Ali, the cousin and son-in-law of the Prophet Muhammad, was Muhammad's rightful successor. They believe that Ali and his descendants, the Imams, are the true spiritual and political leaders of the Muslim community. Shiism is based on the idea of the divine legitimacy of Ali's lineage, and its followers focus particularly on the spiritual and mystical aspects of Islam. Sunnis, on the other hand, represent the majority of Muslims and maintain that the caliph should be elected on the basis of his competence and piety. Muawiya, the governor of Syria, became a key figure in Sunni history when he clashed with Ali at the Battle of Siffin in 657. This battle, which ended in a stalemate and led to controversial arbitration, was a decisive moment, exacerbating divisions within the Muslim community. Ali's acceptance of arbitration at Siffin caused a rift with some of his supporters, who felt that by accepting arbitration he was betraying the principles of Islam. These dissidents became known as the Kharijites, a group who advocated a strict and sometimes extreme interpretation of Islam, and who opposed both Ali and Muawiya.

After the assassination of Ali in 661, often attributed to the Kharijites, Muawiya established the Umayyad caliphate, marking the beginning of a dynasty in which succession became hereditary. This period was marked by ongoing tension and conflict between the supporters of Ali and the Umayyad rulers. Muawiya's son Yazid is particularly unpopular in Shia tradition for his role in the massacre of Husayn, Ali's son, at the Battle of Kerbala in 680. This tragic event is at the heart of the Shia commemoration of Ashura and symbolises the fight against injustice and oppression. These early divisions and conflicts within Islam laid the foundations for the doctrinal, political and cultural differences that characterise relations between Sunnis, Shias and Kharijites to this day. These events not only shaped the history of the Muslim world, but also had a profound impact on politics, society and culture in the regions where Islam is practised.

The Battle of Kerbala and its Impact on Shi'ism

The Battle of Kerbala, which took place in Iraq in 680 AD, is one of the most tragic and significant events in the history of Islam, particularly for the Shiites. The battle pitted Husayn ibn Ali, Muhammad's grandson and a central figure in Shi'ism, against the forces of the Umayyad caliph Yazid I. Husayn, along with a small group of supporters and family members, had travelled to Kerbala to challenge the legitimacy of the Umayyad caliphate, which the Shiites considered illegitimate and corrupt. Yazid's vastly superior forces surrounded Husayn and his supporters. Despite offers of surrender, Husayn chose to resist, leading to an unequal battle in which he and almost all his companions were killed. Husayn's death at Kerbala has become a powerful symbol of resistance to oppression and sacrifice for justice in the Shia tradition. His death is commemorated every year during the month of Muharram, particularly on the day of Ashura, when Shiites around the world remember his martyrdom with rituals of mourning and commemoration.

This historical map illustrates the Mediterranean world around 750 AD, highlighting the territorial extent of the Umayyad Caliphate at its height, as well as the other major political entities of the period.

The area in green represents the Umayyad Caliphate, which extended from the Iberian Peninsula (Al-Andalus) in the east to the borders of India, encompassing the Maghreb, Egypt, the Arabian Peninsula and vast regions of the Middle East. The Umayyad Caliphate, with Damascus as its capital, expanded rapidly following the Muslim conquests that began in the 7th century. The inclusion of cities such as Cordoba, Seville and Toledo shows the extent of their power in Europe, while cities such as Kairouan in North Africa and Fustat in Egypt highlight their presence in Africa. In red, we see the Frankish Kingdom under the reign of Pepin the Short. The Franks, under the leadership of Charles Martel, halted the Umayyad advance into Europe at the Battle of Poitiers in 732, which is often regarded as a decisive moment in the containment of Islamic expansion in Western Europe. The colour blue indicates the Byzantine Empire, also known as the Eastern Roman Empire, which maintained its capital at Constantinople (modern-day Istanbul). Despite losing territory to the Arabs, the Byzantine Empire managed to resist and hold on to key regions such as Anatolia, the Balkans and parts of Italy, as evidenced by the presence of Syracuse and Ravenna on the map. The Lombard Kingdom, not highlighted on the map but present in the region of Northern Italy, is another political entity from this period that was eventually conquered by the Franks. Finally, the small area in light brown represents the Kingdom of Asturias, located in the north-west of the Iberian Peninsula. This was one of the first Christian kingdoms established after the start of the Muslim conquest of Spain, and is considered to be a predecessor of the Christian kingdoms that later reconquered the territories under Muslim control during the Reconquista. The map therefore reflects a period of major geopolitical transitions, with dynamic exchanges of power between kingdoms and empires, and represents territorial demarcations at a time when Europe and the Middle East were deeply influenced by conflicts and exchanges between Christians and Muslims.

The Rise and Fall of the Umayyad Caliphate

The Umayyad dynasty, founded by Muawiya after the death of Ali, established its capital in Damascus and ruled a vast empire stretching from Spain to India. Under the Umayyads, the Muslim empire underwent considerable expansion and a degree of unification, although their reign was marked by internal tensions, particularly with the followers of Ali and the Shiite communities. The Umayyad caliphate finally came to an end in 750 AD, overthrown by the Abbasid revolution. The Abbasids, who moved the empire's capital to Baghdad, established a new dynasty that marked a turning point in Islamic history, with a cultural, scientific and political revival. The fall of the Umayyads also marked a new phase in the Sunni-Shia division, with the Shia continuing to develop as a distinct community with its own religious doctrines and practices.

The historical map provided represents Europe and the Middle East around the year 880 A.D. It illustrates the complex geopolitics of the period, marked by a mosaic of kingdoms, empires and dynasties. The green area represents the declining Abbasid Caliphate, which succeeded the Umayyads and whose capital was Baghdad. This entity enjoyed a golden age of scientific, cultural and economic development, but during this period its political influence began to wane due to internal revolts and pressure from emerging powers. There were several kingdoms in Spain, including León, Navarre and Aragon, in addition to territories still under Muslim control, such as those governed by the Umayyad emirate of Cordoba, shown in green chequered. These Muslim regions of Spain, known as Al-Andalus, were centres of learning and culture where Muslims, Christians and Jews coexisted. The red and white striped area indicates the Papal States under papal authority, centred around Rome, symbolising papal power in the Italian peninsula. The orange and yellow areas represent the Frankish Kingdom, divided into West and East Francia. By this time, the Carolingian Empire, once unified under Charlemagne, had fragmented, leading to the formation of what would later become France and Germany. The Byzantine Empire, in light blue, with Constantinople as its capital, although weakened by internal struggles and external conflicts, maintained its presence in the eastern Mediterranean, including regions such as Anatolia, the Balkans and parts of southern Italy. In North Africa, the Aghlabid and Idrisid dynasties, as well as the Rustamids (in green with stripes), all stemming from dissidences or branches of the great Islamic movement, established autonomous reigns, with varying degrees of allegiance or independence from the Abbasid caliphate. Finally, the Bulgarian Kingdom, shown in purple, represents another significant power of this period, having extended its influence into the Balkans and sometimes challenging the Byzantine Empire. This map reveals the political fragmentation of the period, with the rise of new powers, the decentralisation of power and the complex interaction between different religious and secular authorities. It depicts a period of transition between the Carolingian age and the beginnings of the formation of European nation-states, while also showing the gradual weakening of the Islamic caliphates in the face of rising internal and external forces.

The Rise and Fall of the Abbasid Caliphate

The transition from the Umayyad to the Abbasid dynasty in 750 AD represented a major turning point in Islamic history. The revolt that led to the fall of the Umayyads was widely supported by Muslims seeking change, particularly Shiites and non-Arabs (such as Persians), who had felt marginalised under Umayyad rule. With the rise of the Abbasids, who claimed descent from Muhammad's uncle Abbas ibn Abd al-Muttalib, the centre of power shifted from Damascus to Baghdad. This period, often considered the golden age of Islam, was marked by significant advances in science, culture, philosophy, medicine and law. The Abbasids encouraged the patronage of science and the arts, attracting scholars, artists and thinkers from across the empire and beyond.

However, the Abbasid caliphate began to decline towards the end of the 11th century, largely as a result of the Crusades. These were wars waged by European Christian powers to regain control of the holy sites in the Holy Land. Although the Crusades did not directly overthrow the Abbasids, they weakened the Caliphate by draining its resources and exacerbating internal divisions. At the same time, from the middle of the 13th century, the Mongol invasions posed an even greater threat to the Islamic world. The Mongols, led by chiefs such as Genghis Khan and his successors, conquered vast territories in Asia, including Muslim regions.

The high point of this period of crisis for the Abbasids was the Mongol capture of Baghdad in 1258, led by Hulagu Khan. This conquest not only marked the end of the Abbasid caliphate, but also led to massive destruction and loss of life, bringing to an end the golden age of Islamic civilisation. By the end of the 13th century, the Islamic world had been profoundly transformed, caught between the Crusades in the west and the Mongol invasions in the east. These events not only changed the political structure of Islam, but also had a lasting impact on its cultural, scientific and religious development.

Between 1258 and 1500, the Muslim world remained very fragile between the Crusades and the Mongols. The creation of the Ottoman Empire and the Sefevid Empire (1501-1736) stabilised it.

The map shows the geographical distribution of the three great Muslim empires of the 16th to 18th centuries, often referred to as the "Gunpowder Empires" because of their innovative use of gunpowder in military expansion and consolidation of power. These empires were the Ottoman Empire, the Safavid Empire and the Mughal Empire. The Ottoman Empire, in green, with its capital in Constantinople (now Istanbul), stretched across Anatolia, the Middle East, part of North Africa and the Balkans into Europe. It was an empire that not only made revolutionary use of gunpowder, but also left a lasting legacy in the region in terms of architecture, administration and culture. The area in orange represents the Safavid Empire, centred in Persia (now Iran). The Safavids are notable for establishing Duodecimal Shiism as the official religion of the Empire, which helped shape the religious identity of the region. The Safavid capital was Isfahan, famous for its splendid architecture and its role as a centre for the arts and commerce. In purple, the Mughal Empire covers a large part of the Indian subcontinent. Founded by Babur, a descendant of Tamerlane and Genghis Khan, the Mughal Empire is known for its wealth, its patronage of the arts and architecture - such as the famous Taj Mahal - and its relatively progressive and pluralist administration under emperors such as Akbar. This map illustrates a period when these empires dominated world politics and trade, thanks in part to their military advances and economic power. Their legacy is reflected in the modern borders, languages, religion and culture of the regions they ruled. The period of the Gunpowder Empires was also marked by important cultural and scientific exchanges, frequent territorial wars and flourishing intercontinental trade.

The capture of Cairo by the Ottomans in 1517 was another important milestone in Islamic history, marking the expansion of the Ottoman Empire and its claim to the title of Caliphate. This period marked the beginning of Ottoman hegemony over a large part of the Muslim world, which was to last for several centuries. Under Selim I, the Ottomans defeated the Mamluk Sultanate of Egypt and Syria, extending their empire across the Middle East, North Africa and parts of Europe. With this expansion, Selim I claimed the title of Caliph, asserting not only political power but also religious authority over Sunni Muslims. The transfer of the centre of the Caliphate to Istanbul, the Ottoman capital, strengthened the position of the Ottoman Empire as a major power both in the Islamic world and on the international stage. However, by the end of the 19th century, the Ottoman Empire was in decline. Faced with internal and external challenges, including the rise of nationalism among its territories, competition from European powers, and economic problems, the empire began to lose influence and territory.

Despite this decline, the Ottoman Empire retained the title of Caliphate until its abolition. Although the title of Caliph lost much of its actual political significance, it retained symbolic and religious importance. The Caliph was still regarded by many Muslims as the spiritual leader of the Sunni community, even if this position was no longer backed by substantial political or military power. The end of the Ottoman Empire and the abolition of the Caliphate after the First World War in 1924 by the Republic of Turkey under Mustafa Kemal Atatürk marked the end of an era in Islamic history. This left a vacuum in terms of Sunni religious leadership that continues to influence political and religious dynamics in the contemporary Muslim world.

The Abolition of the Caliphate and the Modernisation of Turkey

The abolition of the Caliphate in 1924 by Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, the founder of the Republic of Turkey, represented a decisive moment in the modern history of the Muslim world. This decision marked the official end of the institution of the Caliphate, which had been a central feature of Islamic governance for almost thirteen centuries. Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, a reformist and visionary leader, was determined to modernise and secularise Turkey in the wake of the fall of the Ottoman Empire after the First World War. As part of his radical reforms, he sought to transform Turkey into a secular nation-state, moving away from the structures and ideologies of the Ottoman Empire. The abolition of the Caliphate was a key step in this process. In March 1924, the Turkish National Assembly abolished the Caliphate, expelling the last Caliph, Abdülmecid II, and marking the end of one of Islam's oldest and most symbolic institutions. The decision was motivated by Atatürk's desire to promote a national Turkish identity and reduce the influence of Islam on state policy.

The abolition of the Caliphate had a profound impact on the Muslim world. It left a vacuum of religious leadership in Sunni Islam and raised questions about religious and political authority in Islam. Many Muslims around the world were shocked by the decision, and it sparked debate about the nature of leadership in Islam and the role of religion in modern society. Since then, no state or movement has succeeded in re-establishing the Caliphate in a widely recognised manner, although the concept of the Caliphate has continued to feature prominently in Islamic discourse. Atatürk's abolition of the Caliphate remains a significant event in the history of Islam and continues to influence discussions on the relationship between Islam and the state in the contemporary Muslim world.

The Emergence and Fall of the Islamic State of Daesh

Between 2014 and 2019, a significant event took place in the contemporary context of Islam with the self-proclamation of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi as Caliph. Al-Baghdadi, the leader of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (EIIS), also known as Daesh, declared the formation of a caliphate over the territories under his organisation's control in Iraq and Syria. This proclamation, made in June 2014, was widely rejected by the global Muslim community, both religious leaders and governments. Daesh's actions and ideology have been condemned as blatantly contradictory to the principles and teachings of Islam. The brutality and extremism of Daesh, including its acts of violence, mass executions and human rights violations, have been universally denounced.

Daesh's so-called caliphate has attempted to establish governance based on an extreme and literal interpretation of Islamic law, but has met with opposition and hostility both locally and internationally. An international coalition, including many Muslim countries, was formed to combat Daesh, resulting in the gradual loss of its territory and the significant weakening of the organisation. In October 2019, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi was killed in a US military operation in Syria, a blow to Daesh's leadership and symbolising the effective end of its so-called caliphate. This period highlighted the challenges facing the contemporary Muslim world, particularly in relation to issues of extremism, governance and Islamic identity. Al-Baghdadi's attempt to revive the concept of the caliphate was seen as a distortion of Islamic principles and raised important questions about the future of governance and religious authority in Islam.

Pre-Islamic Period and the Age of Ignorance: "Jahiliya"

The notion of "Jahiliya" in Islam is a key concept in understanding the Muslim perception of history and society. Jahiliya, which literally translates as "period of ignorance", refers to the pre-Islamic era in Arabia, before the revelation of the Koran to the prophet Muhammad in the 7th century. This period is often characterised in Islamic sources as one of moral and spiritual darkness. The Jahiliya is associated with practices considered incompatible with the teachings of Islam, such as polytheism, social injustice, moral decadence and tribal conflicts. The message of Islam, with its emphasis on monotheism, ethics, social justice and the formation of a community united under faith in one God, is therefore seen as a radical break with the traditions and practices of the Jahiliya.

In contemporary Islamic discourse, the term Jahiliya is sometimes used to describe situations or societies perceived to be far removed from Islamic principles, even beyond the pre-Islamic Arab context. Some Muslim intellectuals and thinkers have used the concept of Jahiliya to criticise what they consider to be corrupt or un-Islamic aspects of modern society, including in Muslim societies themselves. However, this use of the term Jahiliya in a contemporary context is often controversial and debated within the Muslim community. For the majority of Muslims, Jahiliya remains primarily a historical concept, referring specifically to pre-Islamic Arabia and its traditions. Jahiliya is an important notion in Islam, as it symbolises not only a historical past, but also a state of being that Islam seeks to transcend through its teachings on spirituality, morality and community. In spatial terms, Dar al Islam (land of Islam) and Dar al Harb (land of war). There is also a difference between the people: those of the book (Al-Kithab), who adhere to the monotheistic religions and are invited to adhere to Islam, and the others (who disappear).

The Status of Non-Muslims in Islam: "Dhimmi"

In the historical context of classical Islam, the concept of "Dhimmi" is an important notion for understanding how Muslim societies interacted with non-Muslims. Dhimmis are non-Muslim citizens living in an Islamic state, enjoying special protection and certain rights under Islamic law, while being subject to certain restrictions and obligations. According to the principles of Sharia (Islamic law), Dhimmis were mainly adherents of monotheistic religions such as Christianity and Judaism. They were allowed to practise their religion, administer their own community affairs and were protected by the Muslim state. In exchange for this protection and the right to practise their religion, Dhimmis had to pay a special tax called the "jizya". The jizya was seen as a symbol of the Dhimmis' submission to Muslim authority and in exchange for exemption from military service, which was compulsory for Muslim citizens.

This approach was partly based on the teachings of the Koran and the Sunna (tradition of the Prophet Muhammad), which advocate tolerance towards the "People of the Book" (Ahl al-Kitab), the term used to designate Jews and Christians, who, like Muslims, adhere to revealed scriptures. It is important to note that the application of these principles has varied over time and from region to region. In some periods and regions, Dhimmis enjoyed considerable freedom and tolerance, while in other contexts they could be subject to stricter restrictions and discrimination.

With the decline of traditional Islamic empires and the rise of modern nation-states, Dhimmi status gradually lost its practical significance. In the contemporary Muslim world, the principles of citizenship and equal rights regardless of religion have largely replaced the traditional system of Dhimma. However, the historical concept of Dhimma remains a subject of interest and debate among scholars and thinkers, both for understanding the history of Islam and for its implications for contemporary interfaith relations.

Tolerance and the treatment of "People of the Book"

The concept of "People of the Book" (Ahl al-Kitab) in Islam, which refers primarily to Jews and Christians, is centred on tolerance rather than equality in the modern sense of the term. In medieval Islamic societies, this status was a way of recognising and respecting the presence of non-Muslim religious communities within the Islamic state, while establishing a specific legal framework for their integration and interaction with the Muslim majority.

The principles of Sharia (Islamic law) grant the People of the Book certain rights and protections as monotheistic communities with revealed scriptures. They were allowed to practise their religion, maintain their places of worship, and be judged according to their own laws in matters of marriage, divorce and other personal matters. However, this status did not imply complete equality with Muslims within the political and social framework of the time. Dhimmis (non-Muslims living under Muslim protection) had to pay a special tax, the jizya, and were often subject to certain legal and social restrictions. For example, they could be restricted in building new places of worship or publicly manifesting their faith. They were also exempt from military service, which was compulsory for Muslims.

It is important to stress that the implementation and interpretation of these rules varied considerably depending on the period and region. In some historical contexts, communities of People of the Book flourished under Muslim rule, contributing significantly to society, culture and the economy. In other cases, they have faced harsher restrictions and discrimination. In the contemporary context, the concept of the People of the Book and the status of Dhimmi have lost much of their practical relevance, with modern Muslim states generally moving towards principles of citizenship and equal rights, regardless of religion. Nevertheless, these historical concepts remain important for understanding how medieval Islamic societies managed religious diversity and inter-community relations.

Differences and Common Ground: Sunnism vs Shi'ism

The Shi'ite Tradition and its different interpretations

For the Shi'ites, the legitimacy of leadership after the death of Muhammad is based on the principle of divine designation and the family lineage of the Prophet. They believe that the Caliphate should have fallen to Ali ibn Abi Talib, Muhammad's cousin and son-in-law, and his descendants, the Imams. The Shiites believe that these Imams, who come from the line of Ali and Fatima (Mohammed's daughter), possess unique spiritual and temporal authority due to their blood relationship with Mohammed and their divine designation. This belief has given rise to a strong culture of martyrdom within Shi'ism, not least because of the tragedies and persecutions suffered by Ali and his descendants, particularly Husayn ibn Ali, who was killed at the Battle of Kerbala. Husayn's martyrdom is central to Shi'ism, symbolising the struggle against injustice and tyranny.

On the other hand, the Sunni majority of Islam does not recognise the hereditary religious authority of the Shia imams. For Sunnis, the caliph must be chosen by consensus or election from among the Muslim community (Ummah) and need not be a direct descendant of Muhammad. Sunnis focus on the Sunna, the teachings and practices of Muhammad, as the source of religious authority, and reject the idea that a specific intermediate authority is needed between God and the believer. For them, religious scholars (ulama) and jurists (fuqaha) play an important role in interpreting the Koran and the Sunna, but they are not considered to have divine or infallible authority. These differences between Shiites and Sunnis in terms of leadership, authority and religious interpretation are at the root of many of the theological, ritual and political differences that characterise these two main branches of Islam.

Shiism is subdivided into several branches, each with its own interpretation of the succession of imams after Ali ibn Abi Talib, the first imam according to the Shiites. The Zaydites, who are mainly found in Yemen, recognise Zayd ibn Ali, Husayn's grandson, as their fifth Imam. They differ from other Shiites in that they do not require the Imam to be a direct descendant of Husayn through his eldest son. The Zaydites have played an important role in the history of Yemen and continue to influence Yemeni politics. The Ismailis, for their part, follow the line of Imams up to the seventh, Ismail ibn Jafar, from whom they take their name. They diverged from Dualism after the sixth imam, Jafar al-Sadiq, recognising Ismail as the next legitimate imam. The Ismailis are known for their esoteric interpretation of the Koran and their rich intellectual tradition. This branch gave rise to the order of Assassins in the Middle Ages and is represented today by the Aga Khan.

Duodeciman Shiism, which is in the majority among today's Shiites, recognises a succession of twelve Imams, the last of whom is Muhammad al-Mahdi. Born in 868, the twelfth imam, according to Duodecimal beliefs, entered occultation in 941. Duodecimans believe that he will return at the end of time as the Mahdi, to establish justice and peace. This belief in the Hidden Imam is a central element of Duodecimal theology and plays an important role in the eschatological expectations of the Shiites. Shiism, with its various branches, thus represents a rich and diverse tradition within Islam, characterised by a particular emphasis on the figure of the Imam, spirituality and the expectation of the Mahdi's return.

Sunni Islam: Legal and Theological Schools

In Sunni Islam, the diversity of jurisprudential and theological interpretations has given rise to several schools of thought, known as Madhahib. These schools do not represent sectarian divisions, but rather different methodological approaches to interpreting the Sharia, Islamic law. The four main schools are the Hanafites, the Malekites, the Shafiites and the Hanbalites.

The Hanafi school, founded by Abu Hanifa in the 8th century, is renowned for its rational approach to jurisprudence. Abu Hanifa, a pioneer in the field of fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence), emphasised the importance of reason and personal opinion (ra'y) in the interpretation of religious texts. This school is particularly influential in South Asia, Turkey and the Balkans. The Malekite school, established by Malik ibn Anas, emphasises the practices and traditions of the community of Medina, considered to be a model of Islamic society, as this is where the Prophet Muhammad spent the last years of his life. Predominant in North Africa and parts of sub-Saharan Africa, this school is distinguished by its adherence to the hadith, the accounts of the acts and sayings of the prophet. Al-Shafii, founder of the Shafiite school in the early 9th century, introduced a rigorous system that combined tradition (hadith) with analogy (qiyas) and consensus (ijma). His teachings played a crucial role in the codification of Islamic jurisprudence. This school is widely followed in Egypt, South-East Asia and parts of East Africa. Finally, the Hanbalite school, initiated by Ahmad ibn Hanbal, is considered the most conservative of the four. Ibn Hanbal was an ardent defender of the hadith as the principal source of Islamic law, rejecting the use of human reason in the interpretation of sacred texts. His school had a notable influence in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States.

These legal schools reflect the diversity and richness of Sunni Islamic thought. They have helped to shape the way Muslims have understood and practised their faith over the centuries. Although there are differences between these schools in terms of methodologies and jurisprudential conclusions, they share a mutual respect and are all recognised as valid interpretations of Islamic law in the Sunni world. This diversity reflects Islam's ability to adapt to different cultural and historical contexts, while maintaining a consistent framework of belief and practice.

The Middle East, rich in cultural and religious diversity, is home to several religious groups which, although sharing roots with Shia Islam, have developed distinctive beliefs and practices. These groups, often labelled syncretic or heterodox, include the Alawites in Syria, the Qizilbash in Iran and Anatolia, the Druze mainly in Lebanon, Syria and Israel, and the Alevis in Turkey.

The Alawites, concentrated in Syria, evolved from Duodeciman Shiism and incorporated elements of Gnosticism, Christianity and other traditions. Their veneration of Ali as a divine manifestation and other aspects of their theology distinguish them from the main currents of Islam. This particular belief in Ali has often been a source of tension with traditional Sunni and Shia communities. The Qizilbash, originally from Anatolia and Iran, played a key role in the establishment of the Safavid Empire in Iran, and their practice of Shiism venerated the Safavid royal family. The term "Qizilbash" has historically been used to designate a variety of Turkish Shiite groups, characterised by their loyalty to the Safavids. The Druze, whose presence is notable in Lebanon, Syria and Israel, emerged from Ismaili Shiism in the 11th century. Their faith incorporates belief in reincarnation and other unique doctrines, and they practice a degree of religious secrecy. The Druze do not seek to convert others and concentrate on their own community. In Turkey, the Alevis form a distinct group, blending elements of Shiism, Sufism and pre-Islamic Anatolian traditions. They value love, tolerance and spirituality, and differ from orthodox Sunni and Shia practices in their rites of worship and beliefs.

These communities, with their unique practices and theological interpretations, illustrate the rich religious mosaic of the Middle East. Their traditions, often marked by a syncretism of beliefs and practices, reflect the historical, cultural and religious influences of the region. Although sometimes viewed with suspicion or hostility by more orthodox Islamic currents, these communities continue to play an important role in the social and cultural fabric of their respective countries, testifying to the diversity and complexity of the religious landscapes of the Middle East.

Annexes

• Ayalon, Ami. Language and change in the Arab Middle East: the evolution of modern political discourse. Oxford University Press on Demand, 1987.
• Myhill, John. Language, religion and national identity in Europe and the Middle East: a historical study. Vol. 21. John Benjamins Publishing, 2006.